advertisement
Looking for something on the site? Search for it here! Also see Clark's Greatest Hits

Oct 27, 2009 -- Insurance industry revamps variable annuities

The insurance industry is revamping variable annuities into an even worse deal to protect itself from any future market turbulence.

When you buy a variable annuity, you buy an insurance product where you invest in something like mutual funds. If your holdings go down and you die, your heirs receive a payout equal to what you put in. As variable annuities have gotten more complex over the years, it's sometimes possible to redeem the money before dying.

Some people were able to work the system beautifully with last year's market collapse. In fact, certain insurers were forced to seek bailout funds to stay alive when they had to make good on their promise of making investors whole again.

Now the insurance industry is dialing back the benefits and raising the costs on variable annuities to prevent a repeat of what drove them to insolvency, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Instead of opting for a variable annuity, Clark prefers that people look at plain vanilla index funds.

The annual management fees associated with a variable annuity can be as much as 30 times what you'd pay for an index fund. Moreover, most index funds can be sold relatively quickly with no penalty. Not so with your average variable annuity. Some even have a 10 percent surrender charge for exiting out of your contract before 10 years.

So why do people buy variable annuities at all? Because they are sold as a magician's illusion by a salesperson who tells you that you can't lose -- and nets a monstrous commission in the process. That's why you often hear Clark say that variable annuities are "sold, not bought."

Unfortunately, Clark won't be able to answer any questions submitted via commenting. If you have a question, please try posting it to our message boards.

Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • Variable Annuities
    This article is terrible. This is exactly the kind of generalized non-specifc advice that makes my job as a personal financial planner difficult.

    About 50% of my assets under management are in variable annuities. Recently the Wall Street Journal wrote an article praising variable annuities because the guarantees associated with a lot of these contracts saved peoples butts over the last two years. I suggest you read it. Yes there are a lot of bad annuities and product companies out there. Contracts with high costs, high surrender charges and so called bonuses that are only paid if the contract is followed to a "T" or the policy is annuitized (in which case you forever give up the asset to the insurance co).

    I can tell you that on the other hand there are also alot of great insurance companies that offer amazing contracts that are very flexible, offer guarantees you can't find in other investments and well performing funds. I can also tell you that even though most of my clients pay an annual expense of 2% for riders and guarantees on their contracts not one of them has complained about that expense when it prevented their portfolios from taking a 50% or more downturn over the last year like your so called low cost index funds did over the last 2 years. Costs are relevant but they are not always important.

    You shouldn't even compare an index fund to a variable annuity. They are not the same thing. Sure the actual investment or fund in the contract may behave similar but show me an index fund that guarantees the amount you invest into it over ten years will be there at the end of those tens years, even if the market takes a 50% downturn and I might be listening.

    Terrible, terrible article.
  • Variable Annuities
    Help me out Clark. I am a financial advisor with a big national firm. Variable annuities represent 0% of my business. The reasons I do not sell them differ some than your reasons to not buy them. I do not sell them because they are truly very complex, with different policies offering dollar for dollar death benefits and others pro rata. Take too much income one year and other guarantees crumble. Most offer guaranteed income streams at differing ages based on market performance or a step up in benefit base. I just find them confusing and the more I look into them, the more confusing it seems to get. These annuity companies are constantly calling me trying to explain their product. It is what they are hired to do. Where I do not understand your position is when you constantly express a "10 percent surrender charge for exiting out of your annuity before the 10-year mark".

    This may be the case with some annuities being offered today, but just about every major carrier that calls on me sells annuities that have differing surrender periods starting at no surrender period, 4 year surrender period, or 7 year surrender period. This is standard with all of them. I realize there are many providers that do sell very long surrenders, but not ALL carriers (especially the big ones). Yes, they are expensive, with all in costs in the 3 plus % range and higher. Again, not a fan of annuities, but do not think it fair of you to paint them all with the same brush when it comes to surrender periods.
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
THIS WEEK'S POLL
advertisement