advertisement
Looking for something on the site? Search for it here! Also see Clark's Greatest Hits

Oct 07, 2009 -- More employers checking credit reports

More and more employers are weighing job candidates based on their credit report -- even though it's no indicator of what kind of employee someone will be!

This is a practice that started and should have ended with bank tellers and cashiers at retail stores -- basically, people who touch money every day. But now so many businesses check credit reports without thinking it through. In fact, your application often gives them permission to pull your credit.

The real problem is that many credit reports have errors. Public Interest Research Group estimates that close to one-third of reports contain serious errors that can cost you a job offer or prevent you from getting new credit.

This is yet another reason why you should visit AnnualCreditReport.com to pull one of your three credit reports every four months. Remember, you have a credit report from each of the three main credit bureaus -- Equifax, Experian and TransUnion.

Paying off any small nagging debts will immediately help your credit. But if you have errors, be sure to challenge them. When you challenge an error, it temporarily removes it for 30 days. Contact the alleged creditor by phone and in writing to dispute the debt. They're liable for putting false info on your report if you can demonstrate financial harm, such as the loss of a job offer.

Unfortunately, Clark won't be able to answer any questions submitted via commenting. If you have a question, please try posting it to our message boards.

Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • Credit scores and Jobs
    Four to five years ago my credit score was 748. I was able to buy anything I wanted by signing my name. Not that I did that. Then my wife lost her job of ten years and I was laid off from mine. I still for some time was able to maintain the payments. Then I was hurt on the new job. After 3 years of physical therapy, two surgeries and my pay cut by one third. Not to mention once again my wife getting laid off. All a sign of the times. Now my credit is shot. This standard of judging people by their credit scores is counter productive for this country and business in general. A workers credit scores will only get worse because they have a lower or no income. Poor become poorer and need more government services, yet pay less taxes. How will the government make up for this revenue loss, they will raise the taxes of those companies and workers that do work. Companies then make less and lay off more workers. Those laid off end up with lower credit scores. Now nobody will hire them... This also opens a door for identity theft. Recently my wife applied for a job online. She was asked to submit a credit report online. All this before they would even give her an interview. How do we know that this information will be used in a legal manner. Who has access to this personal information.
    I would think a worker with some debt would be a harder worker. After all the goal is to pay off this debt. That worker will take less time off and be willing to work extra hours. The worker in debt will work harder, if only to achieve those merit raises and bonuses. I don't understand how this helps a business and this country.
  • credit checks on future employees
    What does a persons credit have to do with their ability to perform their job duties? I see no connection
  • Pre Employment Credit Report
    It is extremely frustrating to be on a job hunt, then finally landing a great corporate interview (after first passing a pre-employment screening for personality and knowledge assessments) and then be told "if you pay off your (very few and very old) past due balances, then you're hired"!! I have a very good work ethic and extremely knowledgable in my line of work and to hear this was extremely distressful. This type of treatment makes you feel like some sort of criminal. The use of credit reports in this manner is extremely unfair for a large majority of prospective job candidates. I believe it is the reason so many people are out of work, and therefore, unable to pay their bills.
  • credit score judging
    What I am saying is you really cannot judge a person based on their credit score, talk to them and find out what the reason was for the bad score. In some cases and probably more than anyone really knows it is not the persons fault it the the circumstances
  • credit score
    I can not believe some of what I have been reading. You have a bad credit score your a bad person and should not be hired by a company? In my case what a crock. I can show you my credit reports for from 1993 - oct. 2007, my score 743 - 782 through out these years not a single late pay noted perfect credit. Then in oct 2007 the company I worked for closed the entire plant. I could not make credit card payments and my credit score went to a 530. I still have never been late on my car payment or my mortgage. However i had to quit paying on the unsecured credit cards. The credit cards is what hurt my score. Back to my point I am a good person and due to losing my job is what has hurt my score. I am now wondering if this is part of the reason I have not found a job the past 2 years , because prospective employers are looking at my credit score now a score which was flawless before oct. 2007
  • Pre-Employment Credit Reports
    Clark's negative comments on employers utilizing pre-employment credit screening is naive, uninformed, bad advice! Most employers insist on the balance credit reports offer in assessing a candidate's personal character profile. Fiduciary responsibility plays heavily into the total evaluation of employment candidates, and if they do have "some" bad credit, their explanation of the circumstances can make or break the interview. Many candidates with mildly troubled credit are successful in being hired if they give reasonable explanation of what caused the bad credit; on the other hand, egregious and repetitive bad credit should be a huge red flag and the applicant should not continue through the hiring process- but EVERY candidate should undergo a credit screening! Trust me, I know: I've been pre-screening employment applicants for over 30 years and the ones w/ rotten credit inevitably prove to be a bad hiring decision, leaving the company to assess its losses incurred from a derelict (or worse) employee! The professional pre-employment screener/background investigator will have credit analysis skills that can support every candidate's personal character profile, good or bad!
  • Not hired cause of credit score
    I applied with a large metro Atlanta police department, I have a spotless background, never taken an illegal drug. I was told the my credit score was not to their hiring standards and if I could bring it up I could be hired. I had just recently went through a nasty divorce and was laid off from my job right after that. They told me I would be more likely to accept a bribe or be a crooked cop, so to speak. So apparently credit score judges what kind of person you are, and your criminal history and life background mean nothing at all. I happily asked the internal affairs investigator in charge of hiring to show me 5 cops who have the required credit score, he hung up the phone.
  • Why stop at the workforce?
    People who have poor credit records are irresponsible, likely to use drugs, will make poor voting and life decisions, and will use a disproportionate amount of public resources.

    Obviously, they should lose their citizenship and be deported.

    [end sarcasm]
  • I am with Scot
    "Who's research"?

    Insurance companies we all know are corrupt and the next to fall just like preditory lenders!

    1984 is correct, we are just a bunch of numbers!
  • Better a credit check than.....
    Better a credit check than say relying on just googleing or yahooing a person's name.

    Employers need to wake up a smell the coffee!

    That the internet is FAKE! 99 9/10TH of the content on the internet is FAKE!

    Credit check is at least a tracking of how a person may handle money. Good or bad, but it still takes a real back ground check to get the other half of the picture.

    Credit check plus back ground check is not 100% accurate, but it is a start.
  • Overly critical
    Employers who choose to not hire someone with a poor credit report may be losing a very hard working creative employee. The world-reknown photographer Annie Liebowitz made a lot of money but is a poor money manager so she and people like her should not be considered? We are all different with different strengths and weaknesses. We should be considered on who will do the best job based on the job requirements, technical knowledge, and experience, achievements, work habits, abilities, etc.
  • Don't be so one-sided in decision making
    Anonymous is one-sided and wrong.
    What research by whom? References uncited are equivalent to fake science.

    If you don't get a job because of a credit agency error that is the credit agencies fault and your private data should be private anyway.

    The reality is that while correcting the credit report is necessary the correction requires time and is damaging to person in the present.
    Because it is historical, it is not the cut and dried determinant of current nor future performance.

    Also you could mistakenly assign the same derrogatory traits of a damaged credit report to an identity theft victim and it would be just as untrue as
    it is of some damaged credit holders who have cleaned up their act.

    The truth is insurance jacks up rates based on demographics in the same way that many vendors seek to profit from predatory lending practices. Cut it out! How about fair business practices and hiring for all!
  • Moronic Employers
    You show me an employer who thinks credit reports are an important gauge, and I'll show you an employer who's a moron and shouldn't be in business.

    Human resource departments these days use the most inane methods to screen job applicants because they haven't a clue how to find out if that person is a good fit or not.

    My credit score is only the business of my mortgage company, my car loan company and my credit card company, nobody else.

    I've had bad credit with sizable debts and creditors calling me left and right. My financial problems weren't caused by anything stupid and had nothing to do with my job performance.

    Unless someone has a job handling large amounts of cash, fico scores are irrelevant. If my human resource manager passed over a great job applicant because of a credit score, I'd fire them in a nanosecond.

    People should be wary of data. I can pull up data that shows that 99% of all prison inmates eat carrots. Should I not then hire anyone who eats carrots?
    Clark, you're dead on. Keep up the good work!
  • Just like insurance
    As has already been pointed out, Clark's take on this is exactly like it was on insurance -- and is off the mark!
    I agree wholeheartedly that because there's not a direct causal relationship between credit report and employment performance, it is sometime unfair to the prospective employee, and some will have to work harder than they should to clean it up. That's the human side.
    But to insist that it makes no sense, doesn't work, and that employers who use it are stupid -- in spite of lots of data that says otherwise -- tells me that Clark's refusing to use his head here.

    Especially to the big HR departments that go through hundreds of prospects a week, who aren't allowed to be human, using credit reports is an easy way to reduce the odds of getting a real loser. No, it won't eliminate them, and yes they'll drop the occasional star performer, but on average the quality of employee that they admit will be higher, and that's what they're looking for.

    For a smaller employer, pulling a bad credit report on someone doesn't mean you can't hire them, but, just like someone coming into a scheduled interview who obviously didn't wash their hair that morning, it raises a red flag and might prompt you to carefully direct your interview in such a way that you might better determine whether you ought to suspect that it's truly a sign of danger, or more likely an unfortunate event that shouldn't prevent you from missing this hiring opportunity.
  • Catch 22
    What if you lose your job (due to layoffs and recession) and become late on your cards. The UI payments are too low and you can only make minimal payments. A person needs a job to continue making payments...I guess that person will never get a job because some thinks they will steal from the company?!? Not everyone is a crook.
  • I wouldn't hire anyone that I know who has bad credit
    I have a couple of friends/family that are constantly getting calls from collection agencies. They share a lot of the same traits:
    1) Tardy
    2) Procrastination
    3) Depression

    None of these traits are desirable in an employee.
  • Necessary Evil
    Unfortunately credit scores are a necessary evil. Would you want someone with bad credit working at Equifax where they could alter CC, working for your CC company handling your account or working at your bank and having access to your bank information. I wouldn't....the only problem is Credit card companies are sending cards out to minors and they don't realize the bad credit they rack up can/will have a significant impact on their future.
  • Freezing
    If you freeze your credit can a possible employer still get the report? I assume you just can't open a line of credit when its frozen.
  • Bad Credit Scores Should be Private
    I agree with Jim. Sometimes a bad credit report is not the person's fault. I had a great credit score until someone stole my identity. I have NEVER paid anything late or not paid. My youngest 21 y/o daughter has an awful credit score and can't fix it. Why? Her dad died when she was 18 y/o. I'd helped her get a credit card and she fell to pieces, lost her job, and didn't pay. Don't be so quick to judge people because of a bad credit score.
  • Credit Score
    Those posting here are very poorly informed and will shorty get an awakening when their circumstances change and they will know that life is a little more complicated than they are aware of.
    Enjoy your simple view of the world.
  • I use credit scores
    I have been an employer for 20 years and I use candidate's credit scores. They are invaluable. Candidates with bad credit will be bothered by creditors, miss more work, be a bigger risk for embezzlement, and bother me for pay raises more often.

    Personal life spills into work life. An employee responsible with money is a better employee. It demonstrates self-discipline.
  • Right on
    Anonymous is right. Why are two-third of reports free of serious errors? Some are due to luck, but others are due to diligent management. I pull my credit report three times per year. In the first few years, I spent a lot of time correcting errors. For the past few years, it's been error-free.

    If you don't get a job because of an error on your credit report, I equate that as not getting a job because of a typo on your resume. Both are within your sphere of control.
  • Actually, research has shown a very clear connection between credit scores and certain personality traits that are of interest to employers (e.g., timeliness, procrastination, responsibility, etc.). This is why insurance companies, likewise, pull credit reports.
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
THIS WEEK'S POLL
advertisement