advertisement
Looking for something on the site? Search for it here! Also see Clark's Greatest Hits

Sep 29, 2009 -- Variable annuities vs. life annuities by the numbers

MONEY-SAVING MOMENT: Considering a variable annuity? You might want to think again. New research shows that it takes $100,000 in a variable annuity to generate the same income as $60,000 in an immediate payout annuity.

Variable annuities are sold by insurance salespeople as "can't lose" investments. They're getting another boost in popularity right now because of people's fears about the recent stock market meltdown.

Syndicated financial writer Scott Burns recently took an in-depth look at variable annuities. "This year, as with many preceding years, variable annuities are a good deal for insurance companies but a lousy deal for investors," Burns writes in his report.

Let's take one step back -- what exactly is a variable annuity? If you ask those who own them or want to buy them, they have no idea! Clark describes a variable annuity as a contract with the insurance company that masquerades as an investment with insurance wrapped around it.

Variable annuities come with huge sales commissions, huge expenses and a huge tax burden to you. And if you want out, you usually have to pay a massive fee known as a surrender charge.

Burns' analysis also contrasts variable annuities with index funds. Remember, index funds are usually sold commission free. No surprise then that index funds blow away variable annuities over 80 percent of the time.

And the coup de grace here is when Burns contrasts variable annuities with life annuities (aka immediate payout annuities). Insurance people hate to sell life annuities because they don't have big commissions. But as stated earlier, it takes $100,000 in a variable annuity to generate the same income for you as $60,000 in an immediate payout annuity. See Burns' article for an explanation of how he arrived at that calculation.

So when you're pitched on a 'can't lose' variable annuity, remember Clark's words and Burns' research.

Unfortunately, Clark won't be able to answer any questions submitted via commenting. If you have a question, please try posting it to our message boards.

Avg. rating: N/A

Add your comment

Security Image * Please enter the code shown at left
what's this?

What others are saying

  • annuities
    Another moron in the press who knows a wee bit more that your average Joe about finance and investments giving wonderful blanket advice. The biggest problems with annuities is sale abuse. There ARE abusive predators selling inappropriate investments of all stripes to older people. To say, however, that VA's are bad investments is just plain ignorant.
  • Facinated with Antedotes
    I was watching MSNBC a few years ago when Suzi was telling the listeners NO! NO! NO! BAD! BAD! BAD! regarding annuities. However during the show a caller was sharing with Suzi her specific situation when Suzi said "well in that case that would be ok". This actually happened twice during this call. It went from NO! to well that would be Ok! I have a point for all of you to ponder. Do you actually believe that anyone is capable of listening to a specific problem or situation and in a matter of minutes or seconds can provide an absolute solution. I have heard; NO to stocks NO to mutual funds, NO to bonds, NO to insurance, etc...from sources that consider them to be the experts. To those that are consciously competent, you hopefully see the pattern, to everyone else, well don't worry the government will provide all of your solutions. In closing Information is NOT knowledge so stop pretending it is.
  • Hey clark how are you? I was just sending you a little message to ask you a question How can i become rich and retire at age of 35...luv ya
  • JUNK ANNUITIES
    ...THE DIRTY COMMISSION HUSTLERS AND PREDATORS THAT SELL THESE PIECES OF TRASH OUGHT TO BE EXECUTED.....THEY ARE PREDATORS AND PARASITES TAKING ADVANTAGE OF GULLIBLE PEOPLE THAT ARE TOO LAZY TO MANAGE THEIR OWN CASH....IMMEDIATE ANNUITIES BEAR A LOOK...BUT PAY NO COMMISSIONS....NOTE, VANGUARD AND TIAA CREF SELL ANNUITIES WITH NO COMMISSION HUSTLER INVOLVED, AND NO SURRENDER CHARGES....NO COMMISSIONS TO A BAG OF VOMIT PUSHING THEM....
  • annunity
    i got into an annuty with what i thought was a friendly bank lady..it was an insurance co.. at first sucked me in saying 5% interest...tied my money up for 7 years now next to nothing on tying up my money..with out a penality.next year be able to pull out my money.can't wait..should out law selling these
  • Variable annuities VS. Life annuities
    As I informed a client yesterday, I do not disagree with Clark that there are some bad annuities out there. Most variable annuities until recent years were/are B-Share Index annuities that many came and still come with HIGH surrender charges. I too am against those type of annuities.

    I will recommend that each investor evaluate their own particular situation with their TRUSTED ADVISOR. It is impossible for Clark to speak to each and every person's particular situation and to provide ALL of the answers. When looking at annuities(especially Immediate Annuities) be sure to add these two questions to your list of questions for your advisor.
    1. Will I continue to own or have
    access to my prinicpal? If this is a concern for you, an immediate annuity may not be the best option for you.
    2. What level of death benefit will my beneficiaries receive if I unexpectedly died 1 year later? In most cases there is NOT a death benefit to the heirs/beneficiaries.

    Just to be clear, I am not against Clark but I just merely want to help educate his listeners beyond the time allocated on the radio.
  • Response to article
    I enjoyed this article. It seems to be the same argument against annuities. The assumption is that the variable annuity has high expenses. Readers should know that isn't always the case. My total expenses in my VA are 125 basis points per year. Right on track with the average mutual fund. A price I am willing to pay for professional money management.

    Secondly, my father(age 75) and I have(age 51) an annuity from the same company. The calculation of payments based on life expectancy are far more favorable on his annuity than mine.
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
THIS WEEK'S POLL
advertisement