advertisement
Looking for something on the site? Search for it here! Also see Clark's Greatest Hits

Sep 23, 2009 -- AT&T still trying to violate net neutrality

AT&T has been on the warpath against any effort to allow full freedom of speech using the Internet.

The Internet service provider wants to be able to restrict the flow of traffic and give preferential treatment to their own content, while degrading the experience of going to other content providers' sites. It's all about the money.

As always, an AT&T representative is welcome to come on air and dispute what Clark is saying.

Traditionally, you could just go to any website on a wired connection. But there are no rules governing the brave new world of wireless. This goes to the core of AT&T restricting what people can do with the iPhone.

Now, in the past, we've had AT&T reps come on the show and say that it's a capacity issue, that certain applications that clog bandwidth have been banned. But to Clark's mind, AT&T wants to interfere with free speech in order to make money. Period.

Unfortunately, Clark won't be able to answer any questions submitted via commenting. If you have a question, please try posting it to our message boards.

Avg. rating: N/A

Add your comment

Security Image * Please enter the code shown at left
what's this?

What others are saying

  • ATT
    i have two iphones in this household..........i can tell ya first hand ATT is controlling what i can and cant do on my phone. i cant wait for apple to open the door to other providers....cause i will be done with ATT
  • Learn more...
    Economic inequalities exist. Corporations are not going to fix them. Individuals not have the power to change them. What left? I'm not pro-government... I'm just anti-poverty. Prosperity makes everyone richer, poverty makes everyone poorer! Study economics to learn the truth. You are still free to disagree. But at least now you know why.
  • Net Nueutrality is Freedom of Speech
    It's not legal for AT&T to block phone calls to competitors it shouldn't be legal to block websites. Electronically speaking, there is little difference.

    It is true that consumer have the choice to choose their ISP, but it is also true that consumer choice is often overlooked when there is a lack of viable competition.
  • AT&T
    Well AT&T has always been a lousy company since way back when they were the only phone company. Things never changed there and I am going over to Comcast for my provider at the end of this month.
  • re: Q
    I'm sorry, but I cannot fathom a scenario where the free market can hurt us more than the government. If an ISP is blocking content consumers want consumers will not buy the product.

    Am I to believe that AT&T hates making profit so much they will not offer the product consumers want?

    If they want to operate like that other competitors will enter the market.
  • charge for bandwidth
    It seems a simple solution for ISPs to simply charge for bandwidth used. Ignore the content, just charge for the bandwidth.
    _aleph_
  • RE: Stephen
    In many areas there isn't another ISP, or your only alternative is satellite which is even more bandwidth-restrictive. For example, if ATT throttles Google to encourage you to use Yahoo/Bing (or other PAID "partner" site), there will be entire regions of the country where Google will be difficult to access. That's an abusive monopoly, not a properly working competitive environment.
  • Net neutrality
    I hate net neutrality. To me it is anti-capitalistic. If I don't like the way AT&T manages content there are amillion other ISPs I can use.
  • A FEW FACTS TO THINK OVER
    First of all, anyone who did not have 20% on a home purchase was supposed to have PMI. Nobody ever talks about this when defaults happen. Why not? They are supposed to step up if the borrower defaults on the mortgage and cover the loss. Secondly, anybody read the IRS Bulletin recently re the $8000 new homebuyer incentive?? Well gaze at that. First of all, everyone knows you need to have not owned a home the last 3 years, Second, it is either 10% or up to $8000 of the purchase price - that means the home price can only be up to $80,000 to get the best deal. Third, there are income restrictions - $75K for individual/$150K for couples. And this is the best part - you will actually get the full amount paid to you even if you owe no income tax. So if you buy a home for $75K, you don't pay tax or even get a refund, you still will ALSO receive 10% on that home purchase, which would be $7,500. This definitely 'gifts' people who are lower income. What is wrong here is that part about not paying any income tax - and while you're thinking on that, how is this "helping" the financial situation we ALL are involved in here in America?
  • Clark will never have anything nice to say about at&t. He realizes Cox pays his bills and you can't say anything nice about a competitor, even if the service you get is inferior.
  • AT&T
    The biggest crooks out there with the banks and wall street.I dont think people know this but there are companies that charge your company to train your staff on how to cheat their customers legally.
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
THIS WEEK'S POLL
advertisement