advertisement
Looking for something on the site? Search for it here! Also see Clark's Greatest Hits

Aug 19, 2009 -- Reverse mortgages continue to be a bad deal for seniors

Reverse mortgages have been very popular as of late with seniors. With a reverse mortgage, an elder gets to stay in his or her home and collect a check each month from the mortgage company.

You essentially turn your house into an ATM. It's been particularly attractive to seniors who can't afford to sell at a loss and are in need of supplemental income.

But what seems good in concept has not been good in reality. Reverse mortgages have historically come with exorbitant fees and expenses. The forthcoming September issue of Consumer Reports has a write-up on why they stink. Keep an eye out for it shortly on a magazine rack near you.

Another good resource to check is Reverse.org -- a service of the National Center for Home Equity Conversion -- which offers free, unbiased advice on reverse mortgages.

Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve is taking a look at the main part of the mortgage market. There are new proposed rules now open to comment from the mortgage industry through November.

In short, the Fed is trying to force mortgage lenders to lay out in plain English what will happen to you in a loan or home equity line. The proposals would also outlaw kickbacks where lenders purposely put you into a higher cost loan to earn compensation.

Clark hopes the Fed stands up to the mortgage business and doesn't weaken its proposals. We need the industry to have fiduciary duty and work for us, not against us.

And remember to always get several mortgage offers before making a final decision.

Unfortunately, Clark won't be able to answer any questions submitted via commenting. If you have a question, please try posting it to our message boards.

Avg. rating: N/A

Add your comment

Security Image * Please enter the code shown at left
what's this?

What others are saying

  • I'm a HUD/AARP certified Reverse Mortgage counselor, and the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage is a good product for the right people. I've had many clients who have been able to get out of terrible ARMs with a reverse mortgage. I've also have met many seniors that have chosen to the equity in their home to provide for their long term care so that they can stay in their homes for the rest of their lives. And now seniors can use the HECM to purchase a new home to downsize or move into senior communities. It's a good product for the right people in the right situation and my job as a counselor is to make sure that my clients understand the implications of their decision and to help them explore all their options and alternatives.
  • reverse mortgage
    Even if I had heirs, which I don't, they are not entitled to the equity in my house after I die. I don't care who gets my house after I'm dead, and I want to tap all the equity and hard-earned money I put into it.
  • Reverse Mortgage
    It is sad that Clark and most of the comments are from people who know little about the reverse mortgage program. Clark need to educate himself between the difference of a reverse mortgage and a forward mortgage.
    Secondly for those that think you are owed an inheritance - you might want to earn your own inheritance instead of wanting what your parents have.
    Third many seniors want to age in the home they have lived in and don;t want to sell and move. It is not always about the money but dignity in the later years.
    Appears to me not all the so called greed is with the mean old lenders.
  • conservatives are silent on thier tax increase
    Just got a big property tax increase in Cobb with down home value thanks to republicans not funding the homeowners tax credit in the state budget they control, that is a tax increase. Where is the out rage? Where are the tea bag parties?
  • Sell rather than Reverse
    If elderly Mom & Dad, can no longer afford to live in the house, then it is time to sell. Have them move in with the adult children until they can find a nice retirement home/community.

    Reverse mortgages just steal the property from old folks who are a fixed income in most cases. It also leaves a mess for the adult children who inherit. Especially, if there is more than one sibling and they all get some inheritance.

    I have seen paid off homes, go for a fraction of their sale price at the time of death, because one of the requirements is that the surviving partner remains living in the home. But if the survivor goes into a nursing home, you can bet, mom’s house is up for sale. Plus, you invite reverse mortgage spies to “keep watch” on the property and the occupants who benefited from the reverse mortgage.

    Don’t do it, just sell.
  • @Denny
    Sadly Denny seniors are not always the most cognizant group of folks so many are easy prey. There is a while industry of people who prey on them. And it is the younger generation that has to step in and clean up the mess if they become a victim. I remember many years ago a vacuum salesmen trying to sell one of my friends a $1200 way overpriced vacuum cleaner. I asked him point blank, "who are most of your customers." Amazingly he told me "people under 20 and seniors."
  • More Government?
    "Clark hopes the Fed stands up to the mortgage business and doesn't weaken its proposals. We need the industry to have fiduciary duty and work for us, not against us."

    I'm tired of hearing that more government is the answer. If these people would just read the small writing in the contracts and not just sign things blindly, they wouldn't get into trouble.
  • reverse mortgage
    if reverse mortgages are a bad thing what can seniors who are on a low income and can't afford to rent do when the home they live in is in need of major repair? any idea's?
  • Reverse mortgage
    There is nothing inherently wrong with reverse mortgages. Even with the lower home values today, the concept is good and should be workable. The problem is that this industry seems to attract shady dealers who like to prey on the weak and elderly. If my parents were interested in it, I would certainly encourage them to go ahead but only after they completely understood the terms under which they would be operating. Make sure they have a copy of the contract at least two weeks before closing and let an attorney or financial adviser review before signing. Let the buyer beware.
  • owning a home
    It doesn't matter when you are a homeowner whether you own it outright, or have a mortgage for some or all of the home's value. It still costs you about 10% a year of the home's value to own it. Mortgage interest (or foregone investment return on any cash you put into the house), property taxes, insurance and maintenance all add up to about 10% on average of the value of any given home.

    Seniors in need of cash to live on should instead of reverse mortgages, sell the house and rent instead. Alot cheaper than owning. This idea that your home has lost value, therefore you do not want to sell as a reason to take out a reverse mortgage instead is laughable on its face. Remember the proceeds available from a reverse mortgage, not counting the outrageous fees and interest rate is based on the difference between the value of the home and any mortgage outstanding. So you get hosed there in any case.

    You can always tell what is the latest rip-off in the mortgage industry just by watching the lates pitchmen on tv ads. Three years ago it was 100%+ refi's and "if you can fog a mirror we have a mortgage for you" and "a job?, who needs that?" kind of ads from the usual mortgage pitchmen on tv. Now they peddle reverse mortgages.
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
THIS WEEK'S POLL
advertisement