advertisement
Looking for something on the site? Search for it here! Also see Clark's Greatest Hits

Jul 27, 2009 -- Cruise lines reverse course on federal safety bill

The cruise lines have done an about-face and are now supporting proposed federal legislation that would compel their $38 billion industry to be more diligent in reporting crimes on their vessels.

According to The Los Angeles Times, shipboard crime reporting would be mandatory and all cabins would be outfitted with peepholes and security latches for occupant safety under the pending legislation. In addition, the cruise lines would have to make sure on-board medical personnel are trained to deal with sexual assaults.

For too long, the industry used its powerful lobby in Washington to block any such regulations. Clark isn't exactly sure why the cruise lines have had a change of heart now. Perhaps it's because they knew they were winning the battle in Washington, but losing the war in the public eye whenever a high-profile crime on the high seas became fodder for the tabloids.

The consumer champ himself distinctly recalls being on a cruise once when a crew member entered his room late at night. The man ran out of the cabin and disappeared after Clark abruptly awoke from his sleep.

These proposed regulations are so long overdue. In fact, the whole issue also speaks to a problem in Washington. For as long as the cruise industry was opposed, the politicians made sure that nothing happened. D.C. has for too long had a business model where whoever gives money to the politicians wins.

In spite of the problems, Clark wants to reiterate that going on a cruise is an overwhelmingly safe thing to do. Of course, anytime the ships themselves try to cover things up, they're creating suspicion.

Unfortunately, Clark won't be able to answer any questions submitted via commenting. If you have a question, please try posting it to our message boards.

Avg. rating: N/A

Add your comment

Security Image * Please enter the code shown at left
what's this?

What others are saying

  • about time
    only NCL in Hawaii is staffed by American employees...all the other cruise lines and routes use foreign labor who sign on for 6 month to 1 year hitches...they are extremely underpaid (and subsidized by the mandatory tipping policies created by the cruise lines to keep labor costs down)
    I don't think any of them have backround checks done on their workers, they just hope they will stay for their entire contract....after working 10-12 hour days waiting on drunk tourists for months at a time i'm surprized more don't take to stealing or violence. Between 2006 and 2011 a lot of newer and bigger ships will come online creating 30% increase in cabins, and the rates are still about $100 per person per day for a cabin (like its been for years) I bet they havent raised wages in years and now with bigger ships making 5,000 passengers and 3,000 crew members on one ship a reality, crime is bound to be more prevelent. In a dimly lit room one foriegn worker in a ships uniform looks like any other, without a nametag I can't tell who's who and i doubt they will stop the cruise to do a lineup for anyone....I say wait until they have all these big new ships sailing half empty, and they drop their fuel surcharges and prices on cabins, to go.
  • Death on High Seas Act
    Not a defender of the cruise industry however restricting the right to sue by non dependent relatives makes sense. Otherwise every long lost cousin, nephew etc. would jump on the tort bandwagon each time a relative died in a hospital, cruise ship, hotel or anywhere where near a deep pocket.
  • Death on the High Seas Act Amendment Dropped
    The reason the cruise lines did an "about-face" on this is because Senator Kerry offered to drop an amendment to the Death on the High Seas Act from the bill if they accepted the rest of S.588, Cruise Vessel Security & Safety Act. Its companion bill in the House is H.R. 1485 and Congresswoman Matsui has offered the same compromise. The proposed amendment to the Death on the High Seas Act of 1920 would have given cruise victims who die as a result of cruise ship NEGLIGENCE, the right to sue and recover damages FOR CAUSING THE PERSONS DEATH!!! Existing legislation only allows you to sue if you currently depend upon the deceased to provide for your existence. One Georgia woman's father died in a fire on a cruise ship and her lawsuit was thrown out of court!!!!!


    See:
    http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/CruiseSafety/
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
THIS WEEK'S POLL
advertisement