advertisement
Looking for something on the site? Search for it here! Also see Clark's Greatest Hits

Jun 01, 2009 -- General Motors files for bankruptcy

The collapse of General Motors -- the largest failure of a capitalist enterprise ever -- almost defies description. Their debt stands at $172.81 billion, while their (very questionable) assets are at $82 billion.

Here in America, we used to have something called capitalism. If a business got in trouble, it could either fail or reorganize in bankruptcy with DIP (debtor in possession) financing.

If a business could get DIP money, it then shed its assets and renegotiated its business arrangements. Next, it looked for exit financing, where a lender who believed in the company would lend money so the company could exit bankruptcy.

Of course, as a practical matter, most businesses never saw the light of day ever again once they entered bankruptcy.

But in the case of GM, former President Bush gave them $13.5 billion in federal money during his last days in office. He also bailed out the company's lending arm GMAC. Then current President Obama gave them additional money, which took them up to the $20 billion mark, and also axed GM's CEO.

Now the government is looking at a minimum of another $30 billion going into GM.

So what happens from here? The government has already decided to guarantee GM warranties. That's the least they had to do in order to instill buyer confidence.

4 out of 10 dealers will close in the wake of the failure. The remaining ones will make tons of money. However, servicing at remaining dealerships may be more difficult in the interim as the survivors are flooded with business.

There's no denying that the deals on dead GM brands like Saab, Hummer, Pontiac and Saturn will be great. But if you buy, be sure you keep the vehicle for 10 years or longer; the resale value on orphan brands is very low.

Ultimately, GM will emerge from bankruptcy; they're going to shed nearly $80 billion of debt. But then over time, the marketplace will have to decide if their products are good enough to buy again.

And for those who are wondering if now is the time to buy GM stock, Clark answers with a resounding no! We already own about 60% as taxpayers.

Unfortunately, Clark won't be able to answer any questions submitted via commenting. If you have a question, please try posting it to our message boards.

Avg. rating: N/A

Add your comment

Security Image * Please enter the code shown at left
what's this?

What others are saying

  • RE: Blame Obama
    Good grief!!! It's so easy to post anti-Obama, anti-Union, anti-GM, anti-Democrat, anti-Republican, anti-anything on Clark's post and remain anomymous.

    I find it funny though, that a week ago, the local Timberline Dodge dealership owner here in Portland Oregon was spewing hatred Obama's way for not bailing out GMC after the announcement by GMC that his dealership was being closed ("Mr. Obama, you're going down the wrong path" - his exact words)

    Ironically, now that guy got his wish after the government decided to rescue GMC, all you people here are just as quick to point the finger at Obama for doing exactly what that guy was lambasting him for NOT DOING.
    Go figure.
  • WHY WHY WHY
    Why did our govt feel like they had to bailout the auto Industry when just a few years ago they let the airline industry file for bankruptcy. Every major Airline filed and the only the strongest survived.


    Whats the problem with that?
  • Blame everyone but not the real one!
    Well, who is to blame for GM's failure?!According to some of the comments the man responsible for it is,of course, the president because he has no experience, is a democrat and is helping GM to stay afloat! It is a bad idea to save what his predecessor had neglected for so many years!The whole economy was in the craper but in Bush's world the sky was blue, the birds were singing, and the economy was sound and stronger like never before!
    Then the blame is on UAW. Their leaders did nothing but to bully and threat GM's management with strikes and unreasonable demands, like more money and benefits. Their workers $15 hour job was paid $35 dollars. What an injustice?! I am quite sure that that GM's CEO and upper management used probably the same salary table when they figured out their own retributions! A $25 job paid $500 dollars! What the heck they are in charge, they got the knife and the bread and, of course,the bigger slices! But let not be jealous they deserved while the assembly line workers,the UAW people they are just overpaid! Let's make GM in China or Russia and get rid of these outregeous unions!
    Or maybe, come up with some outrageous taxes on imported automobiles, like someone suggested, but the only problem is that these cars are made here in America, so scratch your American head and figure that out!
    Putting all jokes aside, I can not agree more with some of the opinions expressed in this forum who had a more balanced and intelligent understanding of GM's problem and let's be clear and honest; this is not Obama's or UAW's
    problem; is GM's problem.The whole world is changing more tham probably most of us realize, economies, technologies, but more important "thinking." In today's world you "must to adapt" and adapt quickly. GM is like a dinosaur on life support!Would it survive with all the money transfussions that the government is pumping in it?! Hard to say and only time will tell if the bailout was a good or a very bad idea!
  • A lot of that going around these days
    "how on earth do you put a guy with 0 experience, fresh out of college in charge of something of this magnitude?"

    LOL - his name is O-B-A-M-A. He's a college prof with zero experience running anything, but he sure seems to want to run our lives - LOL
  • Response to Jim Rivers comment below me...I was waiting for someone to mention the 31 year old who is now in charge of turning GM around. Are you kidding me?! Not saying the guy isn't capable, but with absolutely no experience in the auto industry...or any industry for that matter, how on earth do you put a guy with 0 experience, fresh out of college in charge of something of this magnitude? I believe in giving recent college grads a chance, but that chance is usually given somewhere near the botton rung of the corporate ladder, not for something like this.
  • Hummer being sold to China
    This just takes the cake, now our army vehicle will be used in China.
  • Obamas pick to head GM
    He puts a 31 year old lawyer want to be in charge of GM. He had no experience even in the auto industry. This is the type of leadership that will force more tax payer money into this gm scheme.

    This same 31 year old did not think GM or Chyrsler needed to go bankrupt earlier this year.
  • Gov run
    If the government is going to own/run GM
    they should consider going into the Gas business. They could cut the red tape and build a few new refineries across the country and produce $2/gal gas to run in your GMUSA Hummers and Cadilacs...they could use the money saved by getting rid of the UAW. They could refine American oil that costs less than $50 a barrel to get out of the ground, before it is jacked up in price on the world market by speculators, then resold to the refinery so they can look like they're barely making a profit....they could even do away with all the taxes on the gas, because all the profit would go to the government anyway...eat that exxon.
  • Union
    This is the single biggest LIE ever told on this forum:

    "Union Workers today only make $10 an hour and receive no medical/health benefits."
  • boycotts do work, Barry
    Otherwise, GM wouldn't be bankrupt! The majority of vehicle buyers have boycotted buying their vehicles for years.

    I'll stop worrying about what the fat cats "earn" when my tax dollars don't have to go towards their bonuses and salaries.
  • Ford will fall too
    "BTW my Ford vehicles are super nice....."

    And how long do you think Ford can survive in competition with GM (Government Motors)? The U.S. government does not like competition, and they will do what it takes to make their investments in GM and Chrysler "successful". Ford is next in line and if you own any stock, sell it now. They will be toast in 18 months.
  • GM
    GM fiasco is just another step in the worker's paradise scenario being played out by our current socialist administration. The health care industry is next. It's doomsday for ayone with ambition and talent, while the union grunts bully their way off the assemby lines into the offices. But smart people will learn to game the system over these parasites also. Ah, third world comes to America. Hold on, its gonna be a ride.
  • GM and the 'anti's
    Boy does this topic ever bring out the “anti” in people. There are anti-Bush, anti-Obama, anti-Union and anti-Management statements all through the comments. Lets look at the path General Motors went down to become Government Motors.

    1)GM saw it could make a ton of money on trucks and SUVs. It put its resources into this very profitable segment, while starving its cars of investment. Very much like an animal evolving to eat the highest nutrition food in the area, GM went for the fat profits. Then the high gas prices came and killed the trucks and SUVs. Toyota and the other non-US manufactures had continued to invest in cars (for their protected home markets which were sold here). With the bad economy, GM could not survive long enough to evolve back into a true full line manufacture. GM put way to many of its eggs into one basket.
    2)GM had fair warning. In the gas shocks of the 70's it saw how well made small cars could sell. It gave us the Vega and Chevette and did not learn.
    3)Sixteen years ago when there could have been a push to remove health care costs from companies, GM and others stood with the insurance companies to keep our outdated health care system based on where people worked. Please note I did not say a word about single payer.
    4)With profits from the trucks and SUVs, GM went on a buying spree, when it should have gone on an investment spree. Money spent on buying other brands, could have been spent on diversifying their lineup and moving to match Toyota and Honda on quality.

    Is the $50,000,000,000 we are putting into GM going to be worth it? It is way to early to tell. If GM goes on to fail like British Leyland, then it will have been a waist of our hard earned money. If GM is saved, and along with it the jobs of many American workers in both GM plants and all of the parts manufactures around the country, then it will have been worth it.

    As for those who think that the US does not build quality cars, just look at Consumer Reports. The US beats most European makers in quality. For family sedans (the Prius is a hatchback not a sedan) there is not a Japanese car that gets the “Much better than average” rating for predicted new car reliability. The Kia Optima, Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan are the only ones. As for “Better than average”, you get the expected Honda Accord and the not so expected Hyundai Sonata and Chevrolet Malibu. At just “Average” you get the Toyota Camry and Nissan Altima.
  • To the economic illiterate, you know who you are
    Salary caps are the hallmark of wealth envy. You shouldn't be worried about how much anyone else earns, it's none of your business. Technically, the US taxpayers are shareholders of GM, but when a company goes into bankruptcy the shares are canceled and new share issued to finance the debt. So the shares purchased by the gov't prior to the bankruptcy are now worthless.

    Boycotts are meaningless. ExxonMobil is impugned by email boycott campaigns and they have the highest profit margins, your boycotts are not working.

    You voted for this by electing Obama and the Democrats to power in 2008, live with it, or use some sense when voting in 2010 and 2012.
  • Poor Steve
    Another way of stating socialism Steve's opinion would be "Imagine what 50 billion could have done to create even more parasites for our new socialist country!"
  • GM...crap
    I am getting sick of all the big business bail outs. They knew what they were doing. It was all about entitlement. How about us citizens/individuals that aren't getting bailouts..
  • gm
    Imagine what 50 billion could have done to feed the poor, provide healthcare to all Americans, and retrain the unemployed.
  • Bust up the UAW
    It's too bad Reagan or Bush didn't break up the UAW like the air traffic controllers union. There are plenty of people who would be willing to build those vehicles for less money. And if the govt. wants to get involved, why don't they put a salary cap on the executives and eliminate bonuses?
  • unions
    It finally caught up with the unions....you were paid $35 per hour for a $15 per hour job and then wouldn't show up for work and when u did, tried to bully management and run the company with threats of strike and shut down if u didn't get more money and benefits.... and of course.... the gov't forced GM to make cars and set standards that wouldn't sell in the market place. Gov't control and unions destroyed the auto industry and capitalism....enjoy fellows, u deserve it.The golden goose is dead.
  • Bail Outs
    Unfortunately, we have reached the point where success is punished and failure is rewarded. Not the capitalism I recall.
  • Government Motors
    This should be Obama's ONLY term. He is clueless, clueless, clueless...
  • GM
    Let's get serious:
    1) We're too big to fail...uh hu, right
    2) We'll do better...uh hu, right
    3) Warranties will be guaranteed...right
    4) Trust us...hum

    Anyone know any good jokes?
  • Government Motor
    Managed by the government and produced by the union!?! Bendover taxpayers and get ready to cough up a lot more money to support these corrupted hacks.
  • GM Bailout
    Markets go up, markets go down. Businesses open, businesses close. Either way, the world keeps spinning and the sun still rises. What is the line in that book? oh yea, It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. BTW my Ford vehicles are super nice.....
  • GM Workers
    Why it is that everyone else makes too money but not yourself? I'm tired of hearing about how the UAW are overpaid. I bet I could say the same for you and your job. Labor usually accounts for 75% of the cost of a product everywhere. Everytime I buy a bag of chips for $3.50 I should complain its not $2 since the workers are overpaid? Get real. This is the same as the "not in my backyard" syndrone. Grow up.
  • USA Car Manufacturing
    We don't have A problem but many with our car industry. The workers are paid far too much in salary AND benefits for the company to be competitive. The white collar work force is more concerned about moving up the ladder personally rather than moving up the ladder in car sales. Their short sightedness and lack of concern about quality has placed GM quality firmly at the bottom of the industry for most models. Incompetent leadership is mostly to blame. Individuals making millions of dollars in salary and bonuses that don't have to actually show any success. None of these "executives" could run a small business where they actually had to do something and be responsible for turning a profit before they got paid. This would be a novel concept but one the entire company should live by. We can't blame every foreign car manufacturer for kicking our butts for its our lack of concern for quality and about everything else that placed them in this position.
    As a bond holder for this LOSER company I am being asked to forgive their debt owed to me and my family while the government essentially just replaces their debt as I lose my "investment". So essentially I am doubly angry in that I have already lost money as an investor and now am heavily involved as a tax payer. I personally vow to never, ever buy a GM car again.
  • gm
    This should have happened long ago. Rather than succumbing to the outrageous UAW demands. The auto companies should have reorganized as smaller effecient companies paying livable but not outrageous salaries to a competitive workforce. In my opinion the UAW plus the constant government intervention on fuel requirements etc has brought a giant to it's knees. If the government would put as much effort into building nuclear power plants here, building a few refineries and open drilling rights we would all be a lot better off financially.
  • GM Bankruptcy
    It was obvious that the bailouts were a cover to get the government into banking and business. Now, here we are, just where we started with a mountain of debt and nothing to show for it. I'm angry and most of my family and friends feel the same way. All the rhetoric about "Change" and here we are. We are now half way through the year and things are just getting worse. Washington doesn't have a clue and obviously doesn't care about the American public. So, why President Obama say that GM Bankruptcy was the one thing that couldn't happen? One of many lies to us that are delivered in a well crafted speech or two or three.....
  • Solving problems
    I hope the GM executives are paid well they deserve it for the great job they have done. Sarc. intended.
    About my Honda= I'm not happy with it. Problems, problems, problems.
    Korean next time.
  • General Motors Files for Bankruptcy
    As one commenter basically stated, let this work itself out and see what pans out. From the historical record, though, consider what happened in Great Britain in the late 60s onwards when they nationalized their automotive industry, among many many other heavy industries; British Leyland rapidly degraded into the British Motor Bungling Consortium. Management was put in place with nobody to directly answer to; they received the same pay regardless of their performance, and when things were really bad, a single line worker could shut down the entire line for a tea or cigarette break at any time he or she chose, with no consequences for doing so. The whole operation was for the sake of the worker; building cars was just a make-work program, largely because of the British Government's political and ideological points of view at the time. All of the issues at hand brought down one of Britain's largest industries in part because they were artificially propped up at the taxpayer's expense, and I see GM's bankruptcy headed in the same direction. GM brought themselves down for a lot of reasons. Part of the problem was they were too big to respond to changes in the marketplace quickly; they had too many divisions and too many designs competing with each other; the massive cost per hour spent per employee, and I mean that in overall cost, not the good wages they received in the end. In my opinion GM manufacturing, and marketing, cars and trucks became a secondary purpose to their existence. Sound familiar? And will the government bow out once / if GM becomes solvent again? Once the camel's nose is in the tent, he's not going to want to leave. But I hope they do and leave capitalism in the hands of the American people and the businesses they run.
  • 50B will buy you another bad Impala
    I chose not to buy American cars because they are generally very poor quality and unreliable. Pick up the latest Consumer Reports and you will see that that American auto makers are dead last in reliability. How freaking hard can it be to build a decent car -- just look how far Hyundai has come in short order. Worse, American cars have been crap for too long and by choice of the auto makers. They should completely dissolve and let arise a new American car company that can compete. I would love to buy American - just make a good car.
  • Gov't Motors
    There is not one thing that the Federal Gov't runs well. And this will be no exception. Obama and the eco-radicals will use GM and Chrysler to reach political ends. There will be more political contributions to the Democratic party from the UAW and more taxpayer money spent to support fat paychecks for Democratic contributors. What we see here is corruption on a scale to make Blagoyavich look like a novice. They will also use this as an occasion to force us out of comfortable cars and into knees-to-your-chest econoboxes. This is sad in every way.
  • GM Bankruptcy
    The Federal Government has little to no place in the free market success or failure of a private business. What President Obama, his administration and Congress are doing is artificially disrupting the free and open marketability of a private entity to conduct business under market conditions and then succeed or fail based on their individual ability to produce a product that consumers desire, period! Now the government will confiscate even more tax monies from the treasury in an attempt to restore this industry. I say that economic Darwainism works. Painful for a while, yes, but a leaner, more responsive industry will evolve once the weaker industries are studied and made examples of how NOT to operate in a capitalistic environment.
  • Worse
    The government will do a worse job running GM. You a'int seen nothing yet.
  • This goes way beyond $4.00 gas
    They have had problems for decades at the "American" car companies. This had little to do with $4.00 gas which is where we are headed again. No one is complaining about gas again, yet its up $1.00 for the recent lows. Congress has blame here as well because they allowed GM to take over so many other auto makers. No restrictions on competion cause this. Banks and financals, gas companies, insurance and loan companies. All to big to fail, the congress did not want to stop the growth.
  • Just another example of letting a company get to big
    GM is just like the banks and other companies that should never have been allowed to merge with other companys.

    GM took over so many other brands that now the government thinks they are too big to fail. The first thing congress needs to do is force these companies and banks to split up. If they are too big to fail then make them small again while we can. FNM and FRE have the same issues. As well as insurance and other financial branches like GMAC. They are to big. If you took tarp money you have to split up. Will congress do the right thing no!
  • GM nor Chrysler nor government but $4 gas ended Detroit
    GM and Chrysler failed not due to government or their incompetence but because the marketplace changed RADICALLY in 6 months thanks to $4 gasoline. With the unfolding political situation what buyers that were left began holing up.
    In an industry where it takes 5 years to re-engineer, rework production, and re-develop suppliers for a different car, a quick radical change in sellable vehicles is a killer. And not foreseeable.
    What should have happened is massive loans to allow reworking vehicles marketable and with high chances of repayment (not unlike Chrysler and Lee in the 80's) so there woyuld be a minimum loss of jobs already impoverished by NAFTA.
    Now we will have Government Motors subsidized by taxpayers; if you don't buy an Obama, you'll help your neighbor buy his.
    Isn't it sad that we're saving Iraq for democracy while we are dragged headlong into socialism.
    If buyers were afraid before, now they are terrified.
  • GM USA/ Canada Bailout
    Clark,
    Are the billions of our US dollars that are presently being spent on GM USA/Canada just a subsidy for GM China. I understand that the GM China worker is working for 10% of that of an American/ Canadian worker. Is this how GM plans on repaying this debt? LOL
    One of your callers today was complaining about the Japanese automakers,what is he going to say when the Chinese maunfactured GM vechicles are sold in the good ole USA. Will they be priced in line with their manufacturing cost in China. I do not think so!!!!!
    Did GM USA/Canada invest so heavily in GM China that they got caught with their check book empty!!!
    We should have let them sink. They will be an anchor around our necks forever.
  • Part Supplier Bailout Response
    Actually the company I am workign for is diversified enough not to need a bailout. Heck we are still making a profit...
  • Let GM collapse and become history
    Clark...I couldn't agree with you more...Capitalism should have taken care of the car companies..there was not enough money to fix it. Why try something that we all knew it wasn't going to work? I don't get it
  • GM
    Oh, and I'm NOT VOTING FOR OBAMA next election. Who's with me on this one?
  • GM
    Tired of hearing about the "union bailout"! Give me a freakin' break! Bankruptcy is the best thing for them.
  • Cascading GM failure
    Please help GM survive the "GM" family wants to keep their jobs. You know the ripple effect don't you?
  • Here's a valid question for the show
    Would this recession be as deep or prolonged if the Government took a less active role by bailing out failing businesses and borrowing massive amounts of money to do so?

    I agree with Clark's opinion about surviving companies being leaner-and-meaner, and this benefits everyone in the long run. How can Governmental involvement possibly contribute to that end?
  • GM and the Cascading theory
    Should we bail out "GM" family now? Come on where's the violins. Yes we dumb americans don't seem to understand the ripple effect of a failed GM. Gosh oh golly it's so important to our country. You stupid americans.
  • G M Retiree health benefits
    I'm retired from the Doraville GM
    plant.I would like to know how the bankruptcy will affect my health insurance and PSP plan?
  • GM
    As a nation, we are being manipulated like puppets and this is only the beginning. We have no voice in washington, only the agenda of the presidient.Hitler also had great rethoric.
  • GM; aka Government Motors; aka Garbage Motor
    This company, and the UAW, are simply reaping what they have sewn.
    My first, and last, GM car was purchased in 1968; they got one chance with me; thank God for the chance to purchase a Japanese car. At least they are interested in continually improving the product, and they offer you something worth having. Profits naturally flow to the company when the focus is on providing a quality product at reasonable cost. GM and the UAW have screwed the American consumer too long, and this is the result.
    I cannot believe that the taxpayers own 60% of this trash.
    The first new car from Garbage Motors should have a chrome plated horse fly as the hood ornament.
  • Ya'll are blowing this out of the water....
    Let me start off by saying I work for a company that is heavily tied in a divsion to the automotive business. As such, my opinions are my own and DO NOT reflect those of my employer.

    With that being said....

    The primary reason for backing GM is that there are many many many businesses tied to GM. If GM fell, there would be a widespread cascade effect throughout the US and world economy. If you think unemployment is bad now, it would have been WAY worse if GM went under. You would have GM employees out of work, part suppliers out of work, dealers going under, mines going out of work, steelworkers out of work, etc.

    The automotive industry is the stil largest industry in the US. Please keep that in mind.

    Not for Obama. I am not a fan of his, but I hope to god he is tellign the hoenst truth in that the govt will not get involved in the operations of GM. I am thankful they didn't go PC and scrap the pickup and SUV line (still one of the top sellign lines for GM). I still want to see who will run the company after the change and how will GM be different tomorrow than it was yesterday.

    Sit back, relax, give it a day and see how it will pan out. In the end, we are still a capitalist system. Liek a Phoenix, from ashes something leaner and meaner will be reborn in the long run.

    Thanks,
    Texan

    PS: I have and plan on still being a "GM" family. For those who do not known the term, all vehicles we own are GM products. I beleive in the brand and hope for the stake of America it continues....
  • Bad business plan
    You can keep defending the UAW and keep saying how the Japanese stole the car business. Keep blaming everyone else for complete failure. We know who had a lousey business model. Why are we still letting GM use old failed management?
    It's apparent they don't know how to do their job. I don't see any change here.

    Sure they dump all their bad credit. Where are they going to get parts from. If I were a parts maker I would require cash for all purchases. No credit for you stinky Government Motors.

    Ford is just real lucky they cleaned up their act early. Cause they could have been in there too.
  • Wake-up
    We sort of got what we asked for : 1)We have been proping up the unions for decades 2)If you voted for Obama...he promised bigger govt.3)For years we bought the notion that we can't build good cars...and now we have arrived.Buy Ford...they didn't take any bail-out $$, so reward them with your business.Call or write your legislators....tell them to stop growing govt.Vote for term limits.This supposed..? bankruptcy tied to another 30 Billion dollar bailout should freighten any rational citizen.
  • used cars
    Need to buy a 2-3 year old truck. Will this make the used trucks and cars sale for more? Is now the time or wait ?
  • Auto Industry
    Why has nobody ever mentioned the 30 year old tariff imbalance? Every nation charges the U.S a tariff on cars but the U.S. charges no tariffs on any nation shipping cars here. Sounds like a rip off to me.
  • Stock
    Is it too late to sell my GM stock? HELP PLEASEEEE !!!
  • GM and the Military
    Doesn't GM supply the major share of vehicles and engines for our military? Who is going to replace GM in the short term if we let it shut down completely?
    Also GM supplies most of the inboard engines for boats. Is Clark also going to force this industry to out of business because of his believe in the myth of so-called "free enterprise"?
  • In response to UAW remark
    Just wanted to clarify...the UAW isn't the problem. Workers today make $10 an hour and receive no medical/health benefits. Also, the $80 an hour information that circulated was for people that work in their corporate offices. Get it right - those people aren't union workers. I'm a registered Republican, and I honestely feel bad for the people that work there now. The Japanese workers make way more than GM workers do. Do your research. I'm sure if you worked there, and made a decent living for your family, and then it was all of a sudden taken away, you'd feel differently. Have a little compassion.

    By the way, the Japanese modeled their plants and cars after GM, so obviously our cars can't be too bad. You might also want to research the patton that GM made for hybrid vehicles...that's right! GM came up with the idea and the government said no. Then, it was sold to the oil companies and on to the Japanese. All the Japanese did was create it - it wasn't their idea.
  • GM - bailouts...
    President Obama said today in his speech that the latest installment of $30 billion will be the last. Is it remotely possible that he's telling the truth? What about all the debt that GM has incurred that has been 'downsized'? What about the welfare of the bondholders and the creditors?
    The thought that Union workers and the federal government now own GM sends chills down my spine... hasn't this been tried unsuccessfully before??
  • GM Bankruptcy
    What do you think WOULD have happened with the auto industry bailouts if John McCain and or Mitt Romney were the President?
  • discounts?
    As a part owner do I get" employer" discounts? I have driven a chevy truck for years and want to continue that Is it safe to buy a new chevy vehicle or should I wait?
  • GM bankruptcy
    Have the terrorists won?
  • President Obama pandering to unions
    Would GM have been bailed out had it not be unionized?
  • GM
    Hi Clark,
    Will GM continue to support the union pensions that caused this problem? If so won't that just perpetuate the problem?
  • UAW conflict of interest non-compete
    Will there be a conflict of interest with the UAW owning part of GM and Chrysler while having people working for Ford?
  • GM
    When the Russian government bought AutoVaz (Lada) they implemented import restrictions to protect their investment. Will Government Motors try to hobble Toyota and Honda with import restrictions or the threat of them?
  • Ford
    How long can ford hold out & survive? What will GM look like on the backend of the Chapter 11?
  • At the other end......
    Lets suppose this bailout works and GM comes out the other end.

    There are no guarentees that their "new" products will sell. Who is going to buy these vehicles?

    I guess then the Federal Govt steps in and requires us to buy products they determine are in the best interest of the country.

    Jim
  • Lets help GM fail
    We all need to boycott GM products, they deserve to die.

    I think we should have taken that 50 billion dollars and started a new car company that did not have unions. That new car company could then hire all the old workers without union influence.

    Think of the car company would could have built with 50 billion bucks.
  • Where does the debt go
    Ok so I understand a lot of shareholders and credieters loose out but where does all this debt go? Isn't this like to have a big ripple effect beyond GM proper? Finally what is the differance to what GM has done and what we have in place with Social Securit & Medicare with regards to unsubstainable legacy cost?
  • GM
    I do not want to buy a car from a company that is owned and run by unions, who are owned and run by a political party.
  • GM
    Well, Comrades, even the Russian press is telling us the US is falling into Marxism. I don’t want to own GM.
  • Big Government
    I thought Obama said he was not going to grow govt. Now the govt.. is going to own car companies, next, hospitals, all of them, then one church, one money, it scares me...I want to live in the USA nowhere else.
  • UAW
    Will GM be bankrupt again in a few years? Will the UAW quickly attempt to get their concessions back since they are part owners? The market voted and American vehicles lost. Let's see if they can learn...
  • No Way
    The old problem will remain the new problem. The Union. Why do you think the Japs can build a cheaper car? Gov. owned or not the Union will want their piece.
  • American vs others
    Gen X(which I am)and after when we speak of buying new cars the phrase " I will not buy American" is spoken almost 90% of the time. The American automakers cant shake the reputation they earned in the 70s and 80s. Will they ever be able to earn it back?
  • GM questions
    will this be a full reset? including wages/benefits/incentives for all across the board? with govt part owner (read tax payers) can we set comp plans for management to be realistic? How will UAW part ownership impact this? KMart hasn't resolved it's bankruptcy fully. What impact will it have with Albert Koch leading this?
  • GM
    I think that one of the big reasons that foreign made cars have succeeded in burying the american made brands is their ability to build a quality product that will go the mileage distance. I was shocked when my husband asked a saleman when looking to purchase a Mini Cooper...what kind of miiles would could expect to get out of the engine. He said: 300,000. It is now 5 years later, it runs like a top and we only have 100,000 on it with very few mechanical problems. NEVER could we say or compare it to any of our countless GM vehicles we owned which never went the distance.
  • Scary Time in America
    This is very frightening to hear the President of the United States....The United States of America taking over a Car Company. Thomas Jefferson must be flipping in his grave. This is something you would hear in Venezuela or the former Soviet Union. Not the USA.

    How do "We The People" undue this damage or is it too late? I fear this is only the beginning.
  • American Auto Makers
    I wonder why, if the government is going to prop up all these companies anyway, they don't just pick one and let the others go. Why not nationalize one company for say 10 years, pour all our tax dollars into that and develop a really competitive company? Can't help but feel they've just created an even bigger boondoggle than they had to start with.
  • Not True
    Ford stil lsells more trucks than anyone else and is the largest supplier of county, state and city vehicles to both law enforcement and government. Ford especially makes very good vehicles. The top end of their re-launched Taurus line has features you can't even get on an Infiniti or Lexus - and it costs a little less. The Japanese would never let American auto makers take over their market share. I don't understand why we don't make it harder for them to sell cars here.
  • All those millions and millions of blown intake gaskets and their dexcool antifreeze that turned to sludge in the engine from the early nineties to the mid 2000's is what did them in.
    Not to mention their theft lock system that would just go out and not let you start your car. Then you have to go to the dealerships and get raped to get it fixed.
  • American Auto Makers
    The American Auto Companies do not have poor quality. They just have to pay a higher wage than the Japanese auto makers and thus have to charge more for their cars. Why the country ever let the Japanese take over the car industry in this country is beyond me. It undercut american workers and american products. We make better cars and trucks than anyone (yes, even our hybrids are better). I prefer Ford and Chrysler to GM but it is important to buy American. When you buy a Honda Civic Hybrid instead of a Ford Fusion Hybrid (cheaper, better gas mileage, much more stylsih) YOU are a part of the problem.
  • gm
    many people will lose jobs due to the bankruptcy of GM. how can the president say this is helpful to our economy? people cannot buy cars if they do not have a job. couldn't there have been another solution?
  • Quality
    If the government is actually going to control GM then I hope at least they will impose some sort of requirements to improve quality. Poor quality is the real reason for the American auto collapse. Can't we implement some sort of program to run the shops like the Japanese (quality of work, higher quality parts, better testing, etc.)?
  • Government motors
    Now that the government is going to run GM. What can Toyota and Honda do when Obama decides to give government discounts for buyers of GM products. Won't this be considered unfair business practice tactics that will hurt all the other manufactors? This will hurt all the other auto manufactors. Destroying the rich manufactors to help the poor manufactors.
  • Please comment here
    Clark will read these and address on air live at 1pm EST!
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
THIS WEEK'S POLL
advertisement