advertisement
Looking for something on the site? Search for it here! Also see Clark's Greatest Hits

Nov 26, 2008 -- To litigate or settle out of court?

Callers often ask Clark if they should settle out of court or wait for a trial judgment in the case of a dispute. Though he isn't a lawyer, Clark believes it's often better to try to make a deal out of court.

Now the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies confirms that belief. About two-thirds of time, you'll get less money going to court than you would by taking a settlement offer.

Going to court involves too many variables. If you're ruled against, you might even be required to pay your legal fees plus the other side's legal fees. So be careful not to let emotions get the best of you and drive you before a judge.

What if you're the defendant who's being sued? Should you take it all the way to court? Well, only 15% of the time does that make sense, according to JELS. Rarely does it make sense to go to war -- even as a defendant.

For his part, Clark believes states that require mandatory alternative dispute resolution before trial are on the right track.

Unfortunately, Clark won't be able to answer any questions submitted via commenting. If you have a question, please try posting it to our message boards.

Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • Courts
    This is a prime example of how the laws of this great country are not based on justice and truth; but intead, funding, strategy and politics determine who the laws are for. Just ask any father whose tried to have custody and visitation with his children or any small business fighting a large vendor. Our justice system has done more to harm this country than any three planes ever could.
  • Courts
    This is America. Our courts only decide who has the most money.
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
THIS WEEK'S POLL
advertisement