advertisement
Looking for something on the site? Search for it here! Also see Clark's Greatest Hits

Oct 30, 2008 -- Federal bailout of homeowners in the works

The banks, brokerage houses, insurance companies and automakers all got theirs, so why shouldn't homeowners? Clark's talking, of course, about the government plan for a federal bailout of some 3 million homeowners who are delinquent on their mortgages.

This is the first truly organized attempt to assist those facing foreclosure. The fairness issue aside, this is an effort to provide some level of base support for homes around the country. A foreclosure will reduce the values of neighboring homes by around 1%. That's partly because banks do such an atrocious job of managing real-estate owned properties (REOs). The idea of providing a bailout to homeowners is to do a cram-down, with the loss split between taxpayers and the bank. We'll see how it works out on the ground.

The reality is that we have too many houses. The best guesstimates put the figure at anywhere between 3 million to 10 million houses. So we have a ways to go before we burn through that excess. But housing markets that have been going down in value will start to stabilize. It took us several years to get into this mess and it will take us several more to get out.

Be sure to vote in Clark's poll and let him know what you think!

UPDATE: Details of the plan were announced in early March 2009. See Clark's summary.

Unfortunately, Clark won't be able to answer any questions submitted via commenting. If you have a question, please try posting it to our message boards.

Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • Financially Responsible & Regretting It !
    My sons are both in GOOD STANDING & UP TO DATE with their HOME MORTAGES.
    To maintain that status & provide for their families needs, they turned to credit cards!
    They are now, UP TO DATE on their mortages...& UP TO THEIR EARS in DEBT to credit card companies!!
    When do they get "Bailed Out" for being responsible & paying thier bills ???
  • Homeowner bailouts
    I'm a homeowner who struggles to make his payment. Bought within my means and now being punished because I'm not delinquent on my loan. When do people like me catch a break. I even know of some people who just quit paying on their mortgages just so they can be delenquent and qualify for the bailout.
  • Companies offering to help lower mortgage payments
    There are companies offering their services to help you lower your monthly mortgage payments. They guarantee that they'll be able to help you. They really don't get into specifics until you sit down with them with all the required documents. It all sounds good until the end when they ask for their fee. The fee is $1,900.00, which can be broken down into 4 payments. Are these companies legit, what should I look out for? Please help...
  • Owner Financd House
    Do we get any Bailout help are we just passed over because we aren't dealing with a Bank?
  • My Situation
    It was the Government that put us in the foreclosure situation that we are in now

    We were living fine where we were until the city decided they wanted the area

    that we lived in for an industrial park, All we had to worry about was to keep the bills

    paid and taxes each year, They gave us the choice to take there offer or be forced out

    by emanate domain law, We didn't ask to be put in this situation, Our home was paid for
  • Housing Woes
    We bought our modest home 3 years ago and now have to move. Because of mortgage fraud in the area, our value is 30K less than what we owe. We don't want a bailout, only a restructured loan that will help us to sell. We simply cannot afford to write a 30K check at closing! I think most young families, like us, who are caught up in the middle of all of this mess should be given as many options as possible and others shouldn't be so quick to point a finger!
  • the bail out
    I think the only people the government should bail out on mortages are families who have suffered a catastrophic illness and now have enormous health bills and expenses. They have no controll over their circumstances. The people who just wanted the big house "to keep up with the jones" should not be bailed out!
  • Bailout Packages
    I do not agree with any bailout package. People will only try to obtain credit in some other way down the road and not learn a lesson. They should havebeen smart enough to realize they were getting in over their heads. What are we doing by bailing everyone out? Who is going to bailout the people providing the bailout $$? mILLIONS OF PEOPLE WORK 2 OR 3 JOBS AND STILL CANNOT MAKE ENDS MEET. THOSE ARE THE PEOPLE THAT NEED A BREAK NOT THE PEOPLE WE ARE HELPING.
  • Homeowner Bailout
    I am sorry, however, I live pay check to pay check and stil cannot meet all of my bills. AND, I bought my home 20 years ago. I don't have any means of restruturing my debt and I don't believe the gov't should reward stupid homeowners.
  • why no restrutcuring of loans?
    Because just like the bailout where they could have merely rescinded the "mark to market" law the government wants control. Control over the banks control over your 401k. You elected a communist to preside over a socialist congress. You will see government grow beyond your wildness imagination in size and power until "We the People" are dwarfed to insignificance. The dream is fading. Kruschev was right when he said we were so naive that they would keep feeding us small doses of socialism until one day we would be socialists and not even know. Wake up America before it is too late.
  • Why not a no intrest ballon payment?
    Why bailout anyone. Wouldn't it be in everyone's intrest to just restructure the loan? I would suggest the following:
    The lender should restructure the loan in such a way that the total payment would be based on established ratio's of income/debt. Once the total payment is established, an appropriate intrest rate on the portion of the principle outstanding would be determined as well as a shorter term (i.e. 15-20yrs). The portion of the original principal amount not included in the payment would be a balloon payment due at the end of the shorter term. No intrest would accrue or be charged on this amount. At that time the home could be refinanced for the ballon pmt.

    This way everyone feels a little pain and the reminder is there 10yrs from now of the stupidity of the last several years.
  • Bailout
    Those responsible for pushing these types of loans on unsuspecting individuals should be doing Hard Time for their indiscretions. That should include Lenders and members of Congress
  • Bailout Homeowners
    It stinks. Everyone should have to take care of their own problems. We get ourselves into messes so we should ourselves out. The only people who should receive help in my opinion should the disabled, elderly or children. Adults should find a way to make it on their own. Government has literally gone crazy giving away money that the American people do not have and may never have.
  • bailouts of mortgages
    I am opposed to this measure. I think consequences need to be felt so that our citizens don't repeat the overspending of credit again. Those of us who live within our means shouldn't have to bail out others who want so much NOW without any cash backup.
  • bailouts
    I do not believe in the current bailouts for homeowners. Several years ago we were caught in a military base closing. (1998) We had purchased our home 12 years earlier.(1986) There were foreclosures all over our town. We had to move due to a new job for my husband. We were not employed at the base or in any related employment. I actually owned a Mortgage Company and in the 1990's when this took place, strict rules and underwriting were followed on home loans. I truly believe those who find thmselves in the current predictament are there under there own doing. We sold that house for $5000.00 less than we had paid for it 12 years earlier. It wasn't a lot, but we retained no equity in that house. No one bailed out all the homeowners all over the country who homes andf equity was affected by the base closings. The real estate market always comes back. What happened is all the buyers bailed out because they had used their equity as a bank/ATM. Stupid thing to do. Clark has said many times don't borrow against your home. People do it all the time. It's called instant gratification, gotta have it now syndrome. My take is take your lumps and no more bailouts. We'll be paying off this debt for 200 years more.
  • MORTGAGE BAILOUTS
    Sometimes people lose their jobs, some have gotten too deep into the credit card trap, so medical would not be the only reason. Whatever the reason, if at least one person in the household is working and they did not purchase a home that is way above their means, there are choices in bankruptcy. If you are in a certain range of debt, you can file a Chapter 13 which allows you to pay back the credit card debt with the interest and late charges gone, you can keep your home and pay off your debt within 5 years. I believe some chose to let their home go. If this was the case, I do not believe they should be bailed out, but this is really more about economics than the actual individuals. I believe the bailout is being put in place to help us avoid another depression. The important thing to remember is that ALL actions have consequences and there should not be such a thing as a "free ride".
  • Home Mortgage Bail out
    I think most home owners on average would rather see home values CORRECT somewhat than loose their home to foreclosure.
  • Bailout#2
    No way! Except for homeowners who experienced a catastrophic illness in the family, the rest need to be allowed to fall flat on their faces, and that's what Wall Street needed to be allowed to do as well. We pay our bills and mortgages with no help from anyone, why should those people that made bad decisions using poor judgement and keeping up with the Joneses be bailed out?
  • bailout
    I used to be in the mortgage business in 1993-94 when they actually had standards, you know the type, guidelines that strictly qualified people primarily for 30-year and 15-year fixed loans. ARMs and exotics were extremely limited and used for those that may be residing somewhere to work for a 2-4 year period. Their credit was checked! The underwriters for the banks actually were OBJECTIVE in analyzing requests for borrowing! They didn't give out mortgages like candy!
    True, it's ultimately buyer beware but predatory lending started from the top down with extremely easy-to-get loans that many people were one job loss away from falling off the merry-go-round.
    In '94, as RESPONSIBLE LENDERS and BROKERS, we did an amazing, majestic thing - we TOLD PEOPLE NO! NO! You can't get a loan until you improve your credit, NO you can't have a loan until you put 20% down, NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! The greedy brokers, lenders AND borrowers could not say the word NO or take hearing the word NO! YOU ARE DENIED until you have/improve this or that to QUALIFY! They - the banks, lenders, brokers fed into what the advertising, merchants, media and credit industry propagandized which was BUY! BUY! BUY! at all costs and expense. Such a "put the blinders on", "ostrich with head in sand" mentality fueled by GREED folks is what fueled this. Balanced justice should have it where taken advantage of "homeowners", actually "mortgage holders" not "homeowners", do get at least a loan modification to reset the terms to 40-50 year loans if they can't afford the ARMs and 15-30s. Unless you want 10-15 million people in the streets over the next 2 years, something has to happen and a modified bailout may be NECESSARY to avoid roving hoards of nomadic families with destroyed credit who probably wouldn't get accepted to rent apartments in many cases anyway due to lowered credit scores and at least have a place to stay if they work for it and earn it. The mortgage lending industry saw this coming long ago and CHOSE NOT TO STOP IT! It's also a part of reaping what THEY'VE sown as well. Big business has gotten break after break with ultimately triullions in a bailout(s).

    This is not about gimme, gimme, gimme and people from an early age need to retaught or taught period about strict financing and the dangers of credit. Otherwise, folks, it's like the T-shirt I saw recently that said "WINNING is DYING WITH YOUR CREDIT CARDS MAXED OUT!"

    That' the culture and society we've created and allowed to develop and it also has to be unlearned through reeducation about how money works!!
  • I think the banks need to work it out with the individual homeowners. If only we could separate the homeowner groups: unfortunate (medical/job loss), greedy, stupidity, and predatory.
    And we must stop any mortgage with no money down. Bailing out homeowners who are already financially clueless and irresponsible won't solve anything long term. That's just like lotto champs and professional athletes declaring bankruptcy after earning millions. Pi$$ed away. Need to educate in personal financing in high school. It is obvious that irresponsible parents will have irresponsible kids - frim a fiscal standpoint anyway.
  • No need to bail this one
    Have neighbors who moved out. They refinanced at peek of market taking the appraisal value to buy new motorcycle, boat and new boobs (kid you not). They just moved out this week, planning on going bankrupt. Haven't told the bank they left. Sold everything in the house including the frig, dishwasher, and kitchen range.

    Guess the lender bail out will have to cover this one. The values on the other 170 homes in the sub division will have to go down, but they were going down anyhow. No Bailouts should have been handed out. The market would correct itself if left alone.

    People let the government ruin our school systems, now the government has ruined the real estate market, and people want more government invovlment?

    Folks the government is not the solution, it is the problem.


    Dee
  • No on bailouts
    No More Bailouts

    I am a Florida real estate agent. I went to just one closing with a buyer with poor credit who received a Freddie Mac loan. He got an eighty-percent loan and another 20% to cover the down payment. He didn’t have to pay private mortgage insurance like regular folk who pay less than 20% down. He paid no closing costs. When all the paper work was signed the buyer began to laugh out loud and said, “I can’t believe I just bought a house without taking a dime out of my pocket and my mortgage is going to be less than I was paying for rent.”

    My mind went back to when I was in the real estate business in the mid 80s in New England. As the Savings & Loan problems came up and we went into recession I saw people walk away from their mortgages when their real estate taxes went up the first year. I thought to myself, “If people found it easy to go back to renting after investing only 5% down, how much easier is it going to be for people to walk away after not investing “a dime?”

    I have worked for Century 21, Coldwell Banker, Keller Williams. Real estate agents qualify buyers.I couldn’t sit down with a buyer and tell him that he should get himself into this sort of situation. I went to working with sellers in middle-income neighborhoods where buyers were getting conventional loans.

    The subprime mortgage problem originated with the activist group ACORN putting pressure on the government to force banks to lend money to people who weren’t qualified to own houses. ACORN used “credit counselors” and “community organizers” to push for these loans. As mentioned in other comments the Government under Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton provided ACORN with the ammunition in the form of the “Community Reinvestment Act.” The lenders were pressured with government reprisal if they were considered to be “redlining” (that is not giving low income people mortgages because they didn’t qualify for them).

    #2 Fox Video - Obama’s ties to ACORN
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhQAHKxuR1Q
    Interview with Stanley Kurtz of The Ethics And Public Policy Center.


    #3 http://www.consumersrightsleague.org/UploadedFiles/ACORN_AHC_Report.pdf


    How One “Community” Group Helped the Housing Crisis Harm Taxpayers





    #7 http://justsaynodeal.com/acorn.html222

    This shows the individual players, organizations, politicians, businesses,etc. involved with ACORN

    Click on the big acorn in the middle for a list of very informative links to videos and articles involving ACORN and the $700 Billion Bail Out.

    People who are responsible should not pay for the irresponsible. The irresponsible learn nothing from having an easy out, it will lead to calamity for everyone.


    Yes, you know an ACORN “community organizer” very well. Let us HOPE that he is not elected today to add to our problems.

    Diane G.
  • RE: Foreclosure on real estate invested in...
    Investor help?
    It is unfortunate that some individuals who chose to invest in real estate are seeing their investments being foreclosed upon. Anyone who invests in real estate should realize that they must be able to pay that mortgage whether or not the properties are being occupied. Investing in real estate is risky... investing for retirement can be done with much less risk...
  • favoring one group
    We have already favored one group. The banks. They do not have to face the results of thier risky behavior. Why bailout the banks and not the homeowners?
  • Bailout
    The bailout is a "slap-in-the-face" to those of us that have paid out mortgages. However, it's just another symptom of the socialism taking over the country.
  • bailout of homeowners mortgages
    Although is seems quite unfair for so called fat cats to profit from their mistakes we should not compound THE FELONY
    by further violating the law and we should
    now return to Constitutional Principles
    wherein The Federal Government is clearly limited in its powers which do not include favoring any one group or
    individual over another. Taken to its logical extreme any tyrant or misinformed Congressman will use his influence to favor those whose votes and
    support he desires. We were set up to be a Government of laws and not a Government of men but the people have forgotten their precious birthright in this country of freedom from despotism
    and arbitrary laws and regulations. May
    God help us to find our way back to common sense and limited government.
  • Mortgage bailout
    Theis makes me mad. These guys do not deserve a $600,000.00 bonus check. It has been completely mishandled. We cannot put trust in the banking system at all. We can look forward to major disaster. This is slap in the face.
  • Mortgages Bailout
    This is wrong. Why should those of us who understand and live within our means pay for the mortgages of those too greedy to live within thier means. Why should we help someone stay in a house they never should have bought to start with. Let them move into houses they should have bought to start with and let the others go on the market and sell at whatever the market bears. Since I pay my mortgage on time do I get a bailout?
  • Mortgages are a contract between two parties. We already are supporting one side with the $700 billion. Why not prop up the other side? If we should not "bail out" the home owners then why should we "bail out" the bank side. All the reasons why homeowners should not be bailed out also apply to the banks. Should they not also have done their homework? Did they also not know the risks? Or did the all those crafty first time home buyers pull the wool over thier eyes.
  • Mortgage bailout
    I do not think that a simple bailout is the answer. I would rather see the mortgage lenders be required to alter the terms of their contracts, either extending the time to repay the mortgage, or changing the interest rates to a manageable fixed rate. I would like to see this coupled with a tax deduction or credit to protect bank earnings coupled with federal guarantees of these mortgages similar to student loans.
  • Federal bailout of delinquent homeowners
    Another entitlement program. Oy! Sorry, homeowners who are delinquent on their legitimate mortgages should receive no more assistance than those who are able to pay their mortgages.
    On the other hand, homeowners who are delinquent AND suspect their mortages are preditory may have a self-help recourse... to sue the lender for fraud.
  • Bailout
    There are many individuals who should never think of or be allowed to buy a house (or have children) because they lack the maturity, stability, financial means, and wherewithal to maintain or repair property. For these individuals, renting makes much more sense. Many times, a person can rent a nicer home in a more desirable location than they could afford. Not only would they save a great deal of money by avoiding the enormous expenses associated with purchasing, upkeep, and selling a house, costs many buyers never factor into their decision, but they would avoid much heartache and maintain their mobility, should their employment situation change.

    It's time our society start viewing a house as a place to live, not an investment.
  • bailout
    Bush couldn't fulfill his promise to his 'bid-ness' pals early-on with privatized social security so he let them run wild with mortgage-credit. Today, pray that this is the end to the Dark Ages in America.
  • bailout
    Don't forget that the banks made these loans because the govenment forced them to. All part of the great plan to make more people homeowners even if they could not afford it.
  • Home owner bail out
    I sacrificed to be where I am today. Sacrifice is a word not considered by many in our country. My home and auto are modest and I am debt free. This is my analogy. Some people just ride the horse. They don't feed it,curry it or give it water and when it dies they jump off and look for another horse.Why should we provide another horse?
  • bailout
    I've supported myself since I was 16. Why should I support someone unwilling to support themselves.
  • Home owner bailout
    I think a good solution would be to renegotiate home loans to a lower interest rate and extend the length of the loan. This could bring payments down to what the homeowner could afford but not cost taxpayers money by having us pay the cost to devalue the home. It's a fair solution that allows most people to avoid foreclosure without resulting in higher taxes for all of us. Your poll says it best, "I am unequivocally opposed to it. I live below my means, so why should I help somebody who bought too much house?" Again, the responsible are punished and the irresponsible are rewarded.
  • Home Owner Bailout
    HAIKU from Austin Texas

    Home Owner Bailout
    Yet Another Fed Boner
    I've Paid My Mortgage
  • Bailout!
    Why don't they just revalue everyone's mortgage to the fair market value or some percentage there of? Hell, if their giving away money, why don't we refinance to the hilt and then let them foreclose on the whole country! Now there's a thought! Keep up the good work Clark.....and crew because I know you couldn't the job without them!!!
  • Responsibility
    After reading all of the comments below, it's too bad the 3-10 million foreclosures couldn't be evaluated on a individual basis, as not all are deserving of the loss and misfortune,... and not all are worthy of a forclosure bailouteither. I feel bad for those who have lost their jobs and have been in their homes for a long, long time and are now losing them(not so much sad feelings for those with the "5 year adjustable rate mortgages" & other creative loans that were made in order to "get the house" they "wanted" at a much higher price than they could afford). I agree with many of you who have said lenders approved, and then gave mortgages way over what families could realisticly afford. I know of some people who were offered these types of mortgages. They seemed to look at these large mortgage offering, and express surprise with a, "Wow, they told me I could spend "this" much money!" I don't think they were educated in budget reality and responsibility. I was always taught by my parents to alway pay your bills and have good credit, and never buy anything you can't afford. I was taught to save, and not spend impulsively. Some people think it takes me too long to make up my mind about any large purchase. As someone mentioned in a previous comment...you have to do your homework! I research and pencil everything out. Make lists of questions to ask, etc... I do my homework and I would have to say, I've earned an A+! I plan for emergencies and have a savings account that I don't touch except for emergencies. I have an extra retirement plan besides my employers retirement. It takes discipline, but we do it. We don't fall for the "peer pressure" and "keeping up with the Jones" attitudes. We're conservative when it comes to tossing our money around because we know we can only afford so much, and don't want to be in a situation we have seen other friends. I got so angry when I found out some of the same people who have lost previous properties, are losing properties again for the second time! (Isn't there some class they should be required to take??? One is the same family that was given some creative mortgage loan at a high interest rate! Shame on both sides; one for providing the loan, and the other for thinking they needed this home....they were already forgiven by a credit card company for thousands and thousands of dollars....which I now call "fun money"...they had a lot of fun with credit, and didn't have to pay it back, while we said no to things we would have liked to have taken part in, or that extra piece of jewelry, etc...). I figure eventually, What goes around, comes around...but hopefully not at the expense of the rest of all the responsible people!
  • Why A Hand Out?
    People want free health care, free housing, free child care, free retirement, free transportation, free, free, free! And, if they screw up - freedom of their selfishness, greed, and utterly poor decisions. They just don't want to do what it takes to afford all these freebies. Oh wait! Yes, I forgot! We need to approach "The RICH" for more of their "FAIR SHARE" this will take care of the expense ?? - The rich, unfortunately is pretty much defined as anyone with a job...or a wallet. There's a HUGE price to pay when people confuse the cost of these government freebies versus the price of freedom. Once the masses figure out they can vote themselves money then the faster and more often they vote - the steeper the decline.
  • Bailout
    There are approx 55 million people(not families) in the United States. Instead of all that money given to the banks/aig, etc. ($750 million) give a stimulas check to each family for $1 million and we could all pay off our houses, bank cards, autos, etc. and all be in good shape, its our money anyway, taxpayers. Think about it!!!!
  • Bailout
    It was green that got everyone into this. Green on the part of the buyer wanting a house larger than they REALLY could afford, green on the part of the mortgage company, and green on the part of the Realtor who sold the folks the home that they were not qualified to buy. Looks like someone needs to go out and get a second job and maybe a third like we did in order to pay other debt and for Pete's sake, cancel the cable TV and cell phone service for a while. Greed comes with a price.
  • Bailout
    Thank You Melanie. Finally, someone with a empathetic and non judgemental opinion. I truly pray that no of you ever find yourself in any of these situations.
  • bail out
    Why don't the government give the people of the US ( no illigal emigrants) 200,00.00$ of the bailout money and it would within 2 weeks go straight to the banks, mortage holders and finiantial institutions and auto manufactures. What speed and the taxpayer who didn't have any part of the bank failures would be better off.Thanks
  • Bailout
    I am a Realtor in NC and I have been highly effected by this problem and I am very empathetic to those who are loosing their homes. People have catagorized all people facing foreclosures as ones who bought homes they could not afford and that is so untrue!! Wake up people! Do you not watch the news and see that thousands of people have lost their jobs? Do you not still know there is such a thing as a terminal illness that requires very costly medical bills? Do you not know that accidents still happen every day? Do you not know that the high cost of gasoline has effected the price of groceries and other items that we need every day? If you lost your job tomorrow, how long could you go without your income? If you found out you had terminal cancer, could your loved ones continue to pay all the bills? If you had to choose between buying groceries or making your house payment, what would you do??
    The people who are facing foreclosure due to faulty lending were told from their lenders and appraisers that they would be fine...they could afford the payment or they wouldn't be approved..and these buyers believed it! Some people get so caught up in the process that they forget to face reality. And there are a lot of Realtors out there who are more concerned with making a buck then giving good advice. I have talked several people out of buying a home because I knew they were making a bad decision and I have recently had one call me and thank me for doing so. All I am saying is don't be so quick to judge people. You never know what circumstance they are facing. As for the bailout...I'm not sure what should happen and a case by case study would take too long, but if something isn't done soon it is going to effect your tax dollar any way you look at it.
  • Homeowner negligence
    Dear “Saddened in Marietta”,
    If you look into the details of most any of these stories, you will see there is some negligence involved. Look three posts below yours at “My house situation”. I have to wonder why a couple in their mid 60’s would refinance their house for more than it was worth? What did they do with the extra money? Why would they take a loan at an “extremely high interest rate”? Why would they not have enough life insurance to pay off the house? And how is it that they were “taken advantage of” by the lender? Did the lender lie, or not tell them what the amount of the loan, or the interest rate was? This is an example of negligence. I’m sure Stormy in Ga is a fine person, and I’m sorry for the loss of her husband, but that doesn’t change the facts that they were negligent.
  • Bailout
    I am truly saddened by the lack of empathy by most people on this blog. While it's true that we as taxpayers should not be the support of irresponsible people - we must remember that bad things happen to good people. And,none of us are never excluded from falling on hard times. I have seen people use up their life savings, kids college funds and more just to keep their heads above water. All due to some unfortunate circumstance that did not involve negligence or a frivolous lifestyle. I believe that something HAS to be done before we all suffer more than we are now.
  • Bailout
    Restructure the loans -- fixed, at market interest. NO ARMs, NO jumbos. If people cant' afford that, they should not be allowed to keep the home. We should not subsidize failure.
  • No Bailout!
    Homeowners who made "bad" decisions should not be bailed out. If the lender can workout an agreeable extension of the loan (40yrs vs 30 yrs or another option), I am okay with that. But to have the principal reduced is not fair to every other homeowner who has not abused the process. Everyone has to learn that actions have consequences. If not, it will happen again and again.

    I also am not a fan of the corporate bailouts/low interest loans. I believe that large institutions should not be able to grow to a size that makes them "too big to fail" and therefore they have to be bailed out by the government (ie US the taxpayers). They should suffer the consequences just like individuals fail if they make poor decisions.

    This may sound harsh but actions MUST have consequences.
  • My House Situation
    Iam 67 yrs. old and my husband, a Vietnam Vet and POW passed away in February without mortgage insurance, which he had been unable to obtain. We purchased the house in 1998 and were never late nor missed a mortgage payment. Last year he was given a loan at more than the house was worth and at an extremely high interest rate. I only wish that someone would refinance the loan at a lower rate and/or payment. I don't want to lose my home. We always lived very simply, not above our means but the lender should not have taken advantage of him and granted him this loan. Just to let everyone know not everyone in a bad situation lived above their means but were used by an unscrupulous lender and fell on bad times.
  • Bailout
    I really have a problem with the bailout. I feel that it rewards the greedy and punishes the hardworking person. I have paid my mortgage on time, in full, and my utilities, taxes and upkeep for 25 years. I can't get a low rate because I am responsible. I feel that the responsible people should get the 2-3% rates and the people that were trying to get one over on the system should have to pay the 6-7% rates.
  • Qualify vs Afford
    There is a world of difference between what you can "Qualify" for and what you can "Afford", maybe people need to start reconizing the difference. We "Qualified" for 2x the house we bought, we calculated what we could "Afford"
  • Homeowner Bailout
    I knew from the beginning that this was a house of cards. The builders and investers came in and ran the price of housing up in Georgia. Some of the prices were ridiculous/outrageous. When persons were told that they could own one of these highly overpriced homes, the games began. Yes, I feel that the government should 'right' the market and adjust home prices to what they should have been in the first place and get those in ARM loans in fixed loans.
  • Forclosure
    With What happened to me and so many others (see below) Thats what is happening to the economy. It needs to be fixed from the ground up or else there will be more foreclosures and all housing will be worth less. Each one needs to be handled and checked out separately and if the bank can help, by buying down the mortgage to present prices it needs to be done. Thats where the government money needs to go, Not to the Banks to go where ever they want to spend it. A case by case basis. If they were responsible and trying to pay the loan, then, whoever they were, should not be penalized for trying to pay their loan. Sure they should take some responsibility, but so should the bank, when they are forcing people to take out no interest loans. What is the incentive in paying a no interest loan on a house that is worth much less than the loan and the payment will soon go up to where it cannot be paid. The bank made up these stupid loans.Now there is no equity in the house to get a new loan as I anticipated. Either a buy down by the bank or a foreclosure by me. Only loans where someone is not making payments are being paid down by banks. So you have to ruin your credit in order to get help from a bank or the government. Yeah this is what the responsible middle class gets.
  • Wow are you folks Holier than thou
    Really? Are you folks really that blind to the problem most people face? The majority of people with problems are those with Adjustable rate mortgages that couldn’t refinance before the rate adjusted (which many have been doing for years) due to the unforeseen fact that bottom of the WHOLE real estate market dropped out. Yes there are those that bought above their means, but the overwhelming majority is those that are in this boat. Predatory lenders and over extended Fannie and Freddie are the cause of this. Wow and funny they sure got a bailout, huh?.
  • Bailout
    We were taught at an early age not to buy ANYTHING we could not afford to buy. What next...credit card bailout?
  • Help homeowners be responsible
    I am a single woman who also did not purchase above her means and I have saved money in case I lose my job. Extend the life of their loans, lower their interest rate, but no bailout for those who bought too much.
  • We're asked to sacrifice again for others
    First, I love helping people with money I've earned, it's the Christian thing to do.
    Second, this bailout is just putting an extra burden on most of the people who do the right things in matters of finance and at the same time rewarding the few people who are irresponsible.
    My wife and I have sacrificed so much in the early years of owning a home, so it disgusts me to hear that we must bailout other irresponsible people who bought above their means.
    The banks and the borrowers should have no bailout from the rest of us who have sacrificed enough already.
  • being fair
    No they shouldn't bail them out. We planned and calculated how much we could afford to get our house - no bank was going to tell us what to do. They should have done the same. Live within your means. Learn to be responsible and watch your finances. I don't even let car dealers tell me what to do. My money my life - my stress. If I have it under control then less stress. NOT to say things happen in life like people losing jobs. My husband just lost his 3 weeks ago but we can still keep our house with my income. Things will be REAL tight but we just may make it.
  • Bailout
    Put them out in the street or turn them into renters in their current properties why should we pay for people who live above their means?
  • Homeowner bailout
    I can see remaking the loans so they are fair but it should be done case by case.
    I also could say, "here we go again, rewarding people that got in over their heads and doing nothing for people that live well below their means".
    It's time to start rewarding good behaviour TOO!
  • Homeowner Bailout
    I was a single parent for many years. I bought a home I could afford and made every payment myself. I saved for my retirement. Why should my (our) tax dollars go to people who made bad decisions to live beyond their means?
  • Mortgages and Foreclosures
    I have a interest only loan 5 yr arm. I'm on time. I was planning on getting a new loan with my equity by now. My house is worth less. 200,000 paid down to 169,000 is worth about 125,000. Foreclosure time.
  • Homeowner bailout
    I think it's OK for banks to refinance loans that would otherwise go into foreclosure. However, the price of the house should not be reduced. Reduce the interest rate and make it a 40 year mortgage. Do not reward people for buying more than they could afford. I don't buy the concept that people were taken advantage of by lenders - they knew what the risks were.
  • bailout
    I don't think it's fair to those of us who are responsible and pay our mortgage
  • Homeowner Bailout
    You should ask an either or question! Yes or No....True or False!
  • RE: Investor help
    Have you ever heard of asset allocation and diversification and not putting all your eggs in one basket. I hope you learned from your mistake. And, for all of you who think Bush is to blame for all of your woes, you give the man too much credit. If you want to blame someone blame congress for passing legislation to make credit markets so unregulated that every idiot that can't balance his checkbook can own a home and put a new Mercedes in his/her garage. Owning a home isn't a right that the Constitution mandates you. And, if you want to blame someone for the housing meltdown, blame Alan Greenspan for keeping money so cheap for so long.
  • Federal Bailout
    I, too, am against the federal bailout! The free market needs to work not be bailed out by a growing government. The started when Clinton forced banks to give loans to unqualified applicants. This is the usual outcome of things where government becomes involved and should not. It is not the responsibility of government to bail out the private sector. If we lose the private sector, we become socialized and lose our liberties and freedom. Americans should be responsible citizens and the government should be responsible and quit overspending!!
  • Bailout
    My husband and I worked hard to save and pay or house off early. We did not buy more house than we were willing to pay for. We didn't get any help. Why should we be forced to help all these irresponsible people out of their mistake?
  • Bailout for homeowers
    I'm against bailing out homeowners because for many years people have had a tendecy to live beyond thier means. Not only in buying houses, automobiles, and ect.,and all on cedit or litle,or no money down. I'm from an older generation [74] and its has always amaazed me at the younger generations idea of, "got too have it now", and forget tomorrow!
  • Federal Bailout
    My husband and I spent the last 30 years working hard, paying our mortgage and other bills on time, buying only what we could afford, and saving for retirement. In otherwords, we were responsible. Why should I have to pay for other people who were too undisciplined to live within their means? This is not a socialist society - quite yet. There is no excuse for bailing these people out. Their egos wanted more than they could handle and now it is time for THEM to pay the piper.
  • bailout
    I have to live within my means. If you can't afford your house, you shouldn't be in it. Why should I, as a taxpayer, pay for part of your morgage for a house above your means when I'm not doing that myself? It's not right.
  • Federal Bailout
    I am against a bailout for homeowners. If a company, financial or Airline, went bankrupt, I would fire all employees making more than $200K and cancel all golder parachutes.
  • Bailout
    After reading some of the comments by other responders, I see that I am not the only one that feels that it is unreasonable to ask those of us who are responsible to "bailout" those who are not. Government has once again made a decision that does not reward the working!
  • Why Bailout The Irresponsible?
    In January 1994 the Northridge Earthquake damaged my home. I got $9,000 from the insurance company, but repair costs were over $30,000. My mortgage bank offered a five-year personal loan for that amount. I asked for them to roll the amount into the mortgage, but they refused. I ended up walking away from the house, heartbroken. I was responsible with my finances and an earthquake made it impossible for me to keep my house. Why should the taxpayers help people who were irresponsible in the first place? I'll be for a bailout after the crooks and liars and cheats get out of jail.
  • bailout
    is anyone going to reward those of us who gave up things, and made sure our mortgage was paid first? This is not fair-take off 2 percentage points off everyones mortgage who did pay their mortgage and help us too!
  • Homeowner Bailout
    Fortunately, a year ago I bought my first home - I am 63. I have excellent credentials, so everyone in the real estate industry I dealt with - banks, mortgage loan cos., agents - they all tried to sweet-talk me into taking on bigger homes, bigger mortgages, etc. The number of times I said "NO" to these enticements was incredible. This took several months. What saved me from making mistakes? I read and reseached everything I could put hands on, and then some. I read everything on the internet. I spent hours poring over books in several book stores. I wrote and typed everything down and memorized it, so I could process my deal with clarity, correct diction and intelligence - this all came from my brain, not my heart. Am I happy? Yes. What do I say about people who did not do their homework? What did our teachers tell us the days we came to class with no homework? You guys get an "F".
  • Homeowner Bailout
    Fortunately, a year ago I bought my first home - I am 63. I have excellent credentials, so everyone in the real estate industry I dealt with - banks, mortgage loan cos., agents - they all tried to sweet-talk me into taking on bigger homes, bigger mortgages, etc. The number of times I said "NO" to these enticements was incredible. This took several months. What saved me from making mistakes? I read and reseached everything I could put hands on, and then some. I read everything on the internet. I spent hours poring over books in several book stores. I wrote and typed everything down and memorized it, so I could process my deal with clarity, correct diction and intelligence - this all came from my brain, not my heart. Am I happy? Yes. What do I say about people who did not do their homework? What did our teachers tell us the days we came to class with no homework? You guys get an "F".
  • if i had only purchased a $500k home instead of a $125k home two years ago...
    i would be getting bailed out and living like a millionaire! stupid me for buying a home i could afford :(
  • Bailout
    When we bought our second house in 1990 our realtor told us we were pre-approved by the bank for $220,000. My husband asked the realtor how she thought we could feed our family if we bought a house for that amount. He told her show us only houses between $90,000 and $120,000- the amount WE decided we could afford after reviewing our budget! I don't think I should have to pay for those who believed in fairy tales.
  • Homeowner Bailout
    From my high school economics class in 1977 I remember NEVER to get a variable rate or balloon mortgage.

    When my husband and I bought our home in South Carolina in 2003 we found a home we could afford on ONE income in case of an emergency, even though we were two incomes.

    People were so desperate to have their own hmoes they did whatever it took to get one. They figured "I'll worry about it later". NOw instead I have to work twice as hard to pay not only for MY mortgage but now soneone else's.

    It never pays to do things right when if you just wait long enough another taxpayer or the government will pay FOR you!

    Goodbye Federalism, hello Communism!
  • Federal Bailout
    I have a neighbor who could not qualify for a home due to liens and judgments against them. They were able to be an "interest only" loan and barely qualified for that. The wife is a school teacher and also moonlights at a Walmart and the husband works for a department store. They never should have been given a loan and the government wants to help people like this out. Unbelievable!
  • Robin Hood
    I know Robin Hood is painted as a good guy, but robbing the rich to give to the poor just isnt right. Why should I, a homeowner that pays his bills, be forced to pay part of the bills for those who chose to live above their means?
  • Bailout
    The treasury has already been raided to the tune of $700 billion. How much debt is this country prepared to incur? Any additional money would be better spent on public work projects that employ people and that result in income that can be used to purchase homes and other necessities.
  • Investor help
    I am tired of people thinking it's greedy people who bought homes they could not afford only that are in trouble. I have 33 yrs in the real estate business. The majority of my retirement is in condos that were rented & appreciating. Now that's all gone. I didn't do any irresponsible mortgages. I cannot rent them & I cannot sell them. So now I've lost my income & am losing my condos. Carrying these for the last 3 yearsw has wiped me out.
  • Retro Active Bailout
    In 2003 I bought a house that I qualified for with good credit, job stability, and adequate income. However in 2006, I went through a divorce that cost me most of the business I owned and my income was reduced by over 60%. I tried selling the house, working with the lender, but in the end, I lost the house. Bottom line, was an unfortunate change in MY circumstances that caused the foreclosure.

    I had bought the house with a traditional loan and had the income to pay for it. However it was my circumstances changed that caused the problem, but the government was not around to bail me out. But now, for those who were irresponsible and bought homes they could not afford or were banking on refinancing on the equity (that never accumulated), the government is wanting to bailout these homeowners who should have never been approved to begin with. Since I lost my home in the "traditional" way, I guess I should hope the bailout will be retroactive to 2007.

    Seriously, I think everyone should have to own up to their financial decisions and no there should be any type of bail out, especially for those who bought their homes on "hopes" thing will work out for them to keep their homes. But if there is a bail out, hopefully it will be retro active to 2007...LOL!
  • Home Owner Bailout
    I am against rewarding stupidity. If I bought a house I couldn't afford and didn't read my contract shame on me. What's next? I'm upside down on my car so the gov't (let's remember the gov't doesn't make money - they get their money from out taxes) will pay my car off for me?

    Obviously changes need to be made there are a lot of people who should go behind bars for their greed and more importantly conduct over the past 10 years or so.

    I do think that borrowers should be "encouraged" to work with borrowers who can get theirselves out of their weird loans.

    But I should not have to bail out companies nor individuals for living beyond their means.
  • Haves vs the Have nots
    First I am a Have Not, and by choice. I do have a nice house a 2000 Silverado with 200,000 miles on it and a few things of enjoyment. I am a Have not because there is much I choose to Not Have as it would put me in debt. The only debt my wife and I carry is on our home mortgage. We purchased this home for $260,000 and put $140,000 down with a loan for $120,000 because when we sold our first home after 5 years of ownership it's value had risen $60,000 and we had paid extra towards principle every month and walked away with a check for $140,000. We sacrificed a lot along the way to do that and we said no to a lot of things we wanted. It is sad when I see a friend or neighbor that has everything they want and I find out they are stuggling to make payments. Our society and government preach and show by example a life of excess and make the idea of debt OK. My wife and I have choosen to be Have Nots and now we are going to watch as the Haves get even more thanks to the government, who is willing to spend my tax dollars and go further into debt to do so.

    We really aren't fixing things, we are simply redistributing funds for now and in the end we as a country are going into a deeper fiscal hole.

    The ride will end someday and it will not be pretty. In the mean time, I can hold my head up high and look down on many who think they are above me.
  • Home Owner Bailout
    I agree that the federal government should help a homeowner with their mortgage problems IF they were misled by their lender. Any home owners who were aware of the potential problems should not be assisted!!!
  • AH C'MON...
    Wow, It would have been pretty cool, I guess, to have bought the big fancy house and gone delinquent instead of scrimping for years and going without extras and living WITHIN our means in a smaller place...The Gov is now telling us it's ok to try to keep up with the Jones's and buy more house than you can afford...PUHLEEES
  • Federal bailout of homeowners in the works
    I believe it is in the best interest of the U.S. economy and housing crisis to assist those that are at risk of foreclosure, but I also believe that it comes at a price. The Federal Government needs to work with the companies that actually holds the paper to that specific mortgage in ammending the existing contract. Adjust the interest rate only to what it was at origination and have it fixed for a period of 60 months or less. The current homeowner will need to reside in that home for that 60 months. If the homeowner decides to sell for a profit during that 60 month window, then all equity goes to the company and the Federal Government (in reducing the "rescue plan"). Naturally there are 'holes' in this thought, but it provides a sensible starting point and benefits the homeowner and the company that holds the deed to the property.
  • Federal bailout for homeowners
    I am more concerned with Bailing out the people that have 30-year fixed loans and got laid off. Anyone can go through home loss or foreclosure in this day and time. I've used my 401k and my investment money to stay afloat. I was doing everything right. My mortgage company has a special forebearance program that allows me to pay 1/2 your mortgage will you continue to look for employment. This has been a blessing. There are a lot of hard working responsible people out here that's going through tough times. The predatory lenders and the individuals that signed on the doted line for these awful loans are to blame. Homeowners are losing homes, Wall Streeet Fat Cats are living large. And the middle-class is being eliminated because our jobs are being shipped over seas. Only God and prayer can bring peace to this land. It's time to get the old way of doing business out and the new way. It's time for a CHANGE!
  • Mortgage Bailout
    This is a perfect example of why our forefathers supported the division between state and church. The government should not bail out anyone ever. The church /charities should support the effort to bail out people who need help. We should do away with all government funded charities like welfare, food stamps, assisted living and public housing, and let the church do their jobs with all those tax deducible donations. I don't want to pay taxes to support any program that should be handled by the church. So lets lower taxes and get the government back on track.
  • bailout
    Why bailout those 1-2% who shouldn't have had a loan in the first place by the other 98% who are paying their loans?
  • Bailouts Be Damned
    If we have a FREE market we MUST let market forces dictate where and how business and the economy goes.

    Bailing out all the delinquent loans, banks, car makers and anyone else hurts people like me who pay their big mortgages on time while NOT taking a vacation in 5 years or more, not buying a new car, not going out to dinner…

    In essence what I mean to say is that by being responsible for my own situation I am being penalized by government morons who have destroyed my freedoms as much as they think they can get away with!

    Let the market dictate that if bankers do stupid things like lend money to people who can’t afford it then they should go out of business. The people, 1 % or so who borrowed what they were too stupid to read about should lose their houses and go back to being renters or homeless whatever the situation would be.

    Then and only then would banks and real estate come down in price to be worth what the market would bear.

    By bailing out these morons we are only prolonging the pain that MUST come home to roost some time in our future. This way when the stuff hits the fan again we are really gonna be up the river without a prayer or a paddle and the suffering will be 100 times worse then if they just kept their noses out of what they couldn’t possibly understand let alone fix right now!

    ON a side note, if the government stopped trying to re-build places that are below sea level like New Orleans then eventually the housing market could have a chance of coming back and prices would stabilize.

    Keep in mind that the “Baby Boomers” created the need for all those houses that moved the housing market up so drastically in the first place; but now those people are done buying houses and starting to do the retirement thing so vacation and pharmaceuticals are the next big industries to make money. The housing markets are due for a natural market driven downturn until generation X and Y get jobs and want a home not handed down from mommy and daddy. Until then forget about real estate!
  • Bailout
    I understand the economics and what has to be done to save the economy but what about those of us who have saved, invested and paid our mortgages on time? We should get a break on our property taxes, a rebate or some kind of tax incentive.
  • Homeowner bailout
    Seems like we're trying to go Socialistic! Rely on the Government to bail out the ones who get in over their heads by adding more burden to those of us that only buy what we can afford. This seems just like Welfare giving money to those that don't want to work! Whatever happened to personal responsibility!!??
  • Federal Bailout Bad, Responsibility Good...
    Whenever, wherever governments have tried to fix the markets they have ALWAYS made things worse. The VAST majority of those needing a bailout took excessive risks and now are crying foul... Privatizing Profits while Socializing Risks is a bad deal for us citizens having to cough up the dough for the greed and incompetence of others. For an example look at South America or better yet Japan, who would not allow their banks and other large corporations to fail but propped them up and now more than 10 years later they still are suffering an economic downturn. In business as in nature we should not try and mess with the natural selection process whereby the weak die and the strong survive for another day. Keep propping up these corrupt, greedy enterprises and they will continue to suck the lifeblood out of our economy for years to come. Let them perish and they go bye bye giving someone else a chance.
  • Bailout or work out?
    It never ceases to amaze me how the term bailout gets people so upset without doing a bit of research as to how any of these proposed programs would work. From what I've read - and the foreclosure program is only leaked rumor at this point - it would only renegotiate loan terms (lower rates, convert ARM's to Fixed, lengthen terms). No sub-prime loan is going to be excused as some here would think. Sad to see how quick some people here react without thinking first.
  • Federal Bailout is a Big Mistake
    If we have a FREE market we MUST let market forces dictate where and how business and the economy goes.

    Bailing out all the delinquent loans, banks, car makers and anyone else hurts people like me who pay their big mortgages on time while NOT taking a vacation in 5 years or more, not buying a new car, not going out to dinner…

    In essence what I mean to say is that by being responsible for my own situation I am being penalized by government morons who have destroyed my freedoms as much as they think they can get away with!

    Let the market dictate that if bankers do stupid things like lend money to people who can’t afford it then they should go out of business. The people, 1 % or so who borrowed what they were too stupid to read about should lose their houses and go back to being renters or homeless whatever the situation would be.

    Then and only then would banks and real estate come down in price to be worth what the market would bear.

    By bailing out these morons we are only prolonging the pain that MUST come home to roost some time in our future. This way when the stuff hits the fan again we are really gonna be up the river without a prayer or a paddle and the suffering will be 100 times worse then if they just kept their noses out of what they couldn’t possibly understand let alone fix right now!

    ON a side note, if the government stopped trying to re-build places that are below sea level like New Orleans then eventually the housing market could have a chance of coming back and prices would stabilize.

    Keep in mind that the “Baby Boomers” created the need for all those houses that moved the housing market up so drastically in the first place; but now those people are done buying houses and starting to do the retirement thing so vacation and pharmaceuticals are the next big industries to make money. The housing markets are due for a natural market driven downturn until generation X and Y get jobs and want a home not handed down from mommy and daddy. Until then forget about real estate!
  • bail out
    While I don't agree w/bailing out those that over extend themselves, & have chosen to live beyond their means. My biggest beef is the golden parachute,raises,retirement walk-aways,given to the CEO's. That should not be allowed. Gross greed,and Shamefull.
  • People vs Goverment
    I can't believe CT would say "its about time people took advantage of the goverment". What!! The goverment is us. When you take advantage of the goverment you take advantage of your neighbor! By your comment I can only suspect you're used to that.
  • 1% is Low
    Clark,

    With the family struggling to get out of a Libor loan and a foreclosure or two within the neighborhood, values dropped closer to 12.5%. The appraisers, are taking on another 5% as standard practices now days.

    Best Regards
  • Bailout of Homeowners
    What will be next -- bailout for folks who are overextended on their credit cards, cars etc.? This is Intrinsically wrong. Work hard, save hard and plan for emergencies.
  • Baliout
    I think that the individuals that made agreements to purchase a house should try to work with their lenders. If that can't work then they should make a choice of losing the house, getting a 2nd or 3rd job, giving up many of their wants (cable tv, extra car, internet, tivo, XM-radio, cell phone, eating meals out, etc.) and find a way to make their payments. I purposely choose to purchase a house that I could afford with a 15 year mortgage, I put more than 20% down and I pay extra every month. I don't feel that I should be forced to pay extra taxes for those that were not as prudent in their purchases.
  • mortgage bailout
    I feel like I am getting ripped off, although I am happy for others who are benefiting. I argued with the mortgage people when I was getting my home loan and refused to go along with their ARM loan. I ended up with a 6.25% fixed mortgage. I have stayed current - not always easy, though. Now I found out that my mortgage company is going to give folks with the ARM mortgages a 2.5% fixed mortgage if they have shown that they cannot stay current.
  • Bailout
    Once again the government is condoning in rewarding a complete lack of personal responsibility. Buy too big of a house, refinance into too big of a mortgage, don't worry, we'll bail you out. Are they going to bail out my stocks that went down or give me a bonus for only have a 25% mortgage?

    No, why reward someone who is responsible?
  • Federal bailout
    I can understand someone that has had difficult circumstances and cannot keep up, and some folks have been hit with really tuff (and unfair) things in life... Sometimes no amount of savings and insurance could help... BUT:

    On the other hand; living beyond one's means, living off credit, and especially the banking and government groups living off credit... well IMO there is NO excuse for it.

    If GW Bush had bit the bullet back when, we would already be out of this mess, and the GOP probably would be re-elected...

    We need LESS government, more fiscal responsibility, and less reliance on credit in this country. We would be a stronger nation if we could discipline ourselves to live within our means.
  • BAIL OUT
    THIS BAIL OUT WILL CREATE MORE CORRUPTION AND MANY WILL LINE THEIR POCKETS W/TAXPAYER $...PAULSON IS A WALL STREET ADVOCATE & BIG BONUSES WILL BE PAID IN THIS MESS..MY FIRST HOME WAS 1200SQFT,BOUGHT WHAT I COULD AFFORD&PAID FOR IT WITH NO HELP FROM ANYONE.
  • People vs Government
    It's about time people took advantage of the government. For too many years the government was taking advantage of us...nice to see them bail people out.
  • additional agenda
    It's interesting that you ignore the Dems that were in charge of the banking committee that flatly stated that there was no problems with Fannie and Freddie. Bush should have jumped up and down to get the congress's attention but he did fail in this area. Also, what does the war in Iraq have to do with the banking crisis? Surely there isn't any underlying rage one my have for this administration?
  • backup
    It's not that Bush is to blame for the housing meltdown, it's the fact that he is bailing out irresponsible borrowers and wallstreet firms and banks with taxpayer money...if you look at post 9/11 his administration got many blank checks...from unlimited funding for war in afganistan, to giving up our freedoms for the patriot act, to unlimited funding for a war in Iraq where he bullied democrats into letting him spend another trillion, lest they be called unpatriotic or unsupportive of our troops. All to finish a war his daddy didn't.

    In Carter and Clinton's days when a bank wrote a bad loan, they had it on thier books. now with no regulation bad debt is transfered, sold, gambled on and has ruined many companies that should never been involved in bad loans, Bush knew it was happening but did nothing but prop up failing banks with fed money and interest rate cutting. He bought out Fannie and Freddie and AIG and that wall street investment bank with our money. The band-aids he applied to this problem over the last 8 years weren't enough to hold it together until he could get out of office (including his stimulus plan)which was another waste of money we don't have. Clinton had a balanced budget and was paying down the national debt...George Bush acts like hes never heard of national debt and has spent us into a hole that even if banks werent failing, gas wasn't $4 a gallon and unemployment wasn't 6% it would takes years to recover from...this has nothing to do with party politics, whoever gets in will have a big mess to deal with that will last for at least 1 if not 2 terms, all thanks to George Bush and his econonimic ignorance...you can't spend your way out of debt. The only chance he had, was to claim Iraq's oil as spoils of war, to help pay back the trillions he has blown.
  • Bush to blame?
    Please back up your statements that Pres. Bush is to blame for the housing meltdown and resulting financial crisis. All information that I have seen points to govt such as Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton/Janet Reno and the liberals in congress to conhearsed lenders into doing very stupid loads. Why would lenders make such rediculous deals unless that were pressured?
  • slap your math teacher terry
    the 160 billion plan earlier in the year gave each taxpayer $600...people who do math like you are responsible for getting loans they can't afford or understand...I stand by my previous statement Under the Bush administration it pays to be irresponsible! and sometimes ignorant
  • BAILOUT
    I, BEING OF SOUND MIND AND BODY, WELL AT LEAST FOR TODAY, DID NOT AGREE WITH THE GOVERNMENT BAILING OUT ALL OF THESE IDIOTS THAT COULD NOT MANAGE THE BUSINESS THEY WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR. IF A PERSON IS A CEO FOR ONE OF THE BUSINESSES THAT IS GETTING HELP DUE THE LACK OF BUSINESS SENSE WHICH PUT THEM IN THE HOLE AND THIS PERSON IS MAKING MORE MONEY, THAT IS SALARY PER YEAR FOR DOING THE BONEHEAD ANTICS THAT PUT THEM WHERE THEY ARE TODAY, THAN THE PRESIDENT OF THE COUNTRY, THEIR LARGE SALARIES SHOULD BE CONFISCATED, AND THAT OF ANY OTHERS THAT HAD A HELPING HAND IN THE BUSINESS FAILURE AND PUT BACK IN THE BUSINESS TO OFFSET SOME OF THE LOSS. I FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT ANY CEO SHOULD NOT BE MAKING MORE MONEY THAN THE PRESIDENT. THIS MAN IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COUNTRY. COURSE IT APPEARS THAT AIN'T TO PREVELANT WITH THE ONE WE GOT NOW. THE CEOS, THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ONLY ONE BUSINESS AND APPARENTLY THEY DON'T HAVE THE BRAINS TO TAKE CARE OF IT. AS FOR THE BAILOUT OF HOMEOWNERS. HAS THERE EVER BEEN A TIME IN HISTORY WHERE THE GOVERNMENT ACTUALLY HELPED INDIVIDUALS SUCH AS THIS? OTHER THAN THE STIMULUS PKG. GIVEN OUT THIS YEAR WHICH DIDN'T AMOUNT MUCH MORE THAT A SPIT IN THE WIND. DON'T KNOW, BUT KNOWING HOW THE GOV'T WORKS, PROBABLY NOT. THIS COULD BE A GOOD THING FOR THE TAXPAYERS THAT ARE IN OVER THEIR HEAD, BUT ON THE OTHER HAND, ME HAVING MY MORTGAGE PAID OFF HOW DO I GET MY PIECE OF THE PIE??????? THESE FOLKS THAT ARE ABOUT TO LOSE WHAT THEY HAVE PROBABLY PUT THEMSELVES IN THIS SITUATION. I KNOW I DID NOT PESONALLY HELP ANY ONE OF THE THREE MILLION MENTINED ABOVE GET IN THE POSITION OF ABOUT TO LOSE EVERYTHING. I SPECT THEY DONE IT TO THEMSELVES. THEREFORE, THEY SHOULD SUCK IT UP AND TAKE WHAT COMES DOWN THE ROAD. ONLY WAY THEY SHOULD GET HELP IS IF ALL THE, AND I QUOTE " GOOD GUYS " THAT ARE NOT IN THE SINKING BOAT GET THE SAME CONSIDERATION. IF THAT CAN'T BE DONE, FORGET IT!!
    ONCE AGAIN, THE CEOS THAT MAKE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS FOR PUTTING THEIR BUSINESS IN THE HOLE, TAKE THEIR MONEY BACK AND PUT IT IN THE BUSINESS. PUT THEM BACK TO MINIMUM WAGE LIKE THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS!!!! KICK EM IN THE ASS AND DON'T LET THEM SKATE BECAUSE I AM SURE SOMETHERE THEY HAVE BROKEN THE LAW AND NEED BROUGHT TO JUSTICE. Y'ALL HAVE A NICE DAY, YA HEAR!!
  • Reply to Terry on "Bailout"
    Terry, I don't know where you get your math but 125 Billion divided by the number of taxpayers is not $62,500...That would assume that there are only 2 million taxpayers.
  • I do not agree with the gov bailout. The gov will do what they need to do to save their jobs the $700 billion will never trickle down to the taxpayers who they took it from. Its a mess and far from over.
  • Banks do not care, Government either
    I have tried to refinance I can't sell and Im stuck in this goverment created Bush travisty. I have had excellent credit all my life and just because I have been late a few times on house payments it has lowered my credit score and made me out to be the biggest crook there is. This is not right. Combined with the fuel cost. I also am a small farmer. The drought in our area of Charlotte Concord North Carolina has been extremely bad. But you know no one gives a crap about us who all our lives have struggled. And Im still struggling. I have not even had enough money to pay my retirement for the last 3 years and pay my child support and do things with my children that one trys to do. Im lucky my x wife understands what I am going through and in hopes of one day I will pay her back. I still do what I can for her and the children through physical labor after I get home in the evenings. But its hard to make things work when the Banks, Government unwilling to help. Really where is it. I can't wait till Bush is finally gone. Its a disgrace of a President to let all the fuel, the war and our own people suffer like this. I hope he gets paid back in full for the stuff he did not do.
  • BAILOUT
    Thank Osama Bin Laden for your troubles........think about it he has us blaming our own president for this mess.
  • BAILOUT
    It could have been done a lot cheaper Uncle Sam. Instead of the ol' pork barrel why couldn't we let the home owners take responsability by defaulting their loan to a intrest rate of say 5 percent for everybody no matter how late you were, and rolling back the late fees, and restoring credit reports, and giving fines to the banks who made these bad loans instead of bailing them out and asking my grandchildren to pay for it!
  • Bailout
    Instead of giving the culprits $125 Billion we should have given it to the Taxpayers. My calculations we would get $62,500 each. That would mean my wife and I would receive $125,000.00. That would help us out instead of bailing out the people that caused this. When you can’t pay your credit card bills after exhausting your 401k they raise you apr % so you can't pay even less. This is unbelievable. Pay for their mistake but don't give the consumer an inch. If you don’t have a job you won’t qualify for a loan of any kind!!!!! Your credit goes down the tube and it makes getting a loan impossible. How is this to help?

    Terry Butler, Apopka, Fl
  • forclosure
    I can let youy know 1st hand, not all of these forclosures are due to people "living large". When we signed a fixed rate commitment for our home, 22 years ago, we did not forsee my husbands company deciding he had "topped out" in earnings 6 years back (never to get a raise again), in a specialized field. We did not plan my surgery that had me on unpaid med-leave for 3 months, with extra co-pays & other related costs, subtracting my usual earnings. I am fortunate my job was awaiting my return, but it was a difficult time. We didn't forsee his fathers death requiring my husband to take an unpaid leave of absence for 6 weeks during & immediately after that time to assist his elderly mother. We didn't plan his company (of 23 years) cutting all full time employment to 32 hours weekly. We both work, we have no cable tv, no car payments, and due to rising costs, are behind on our payments. The 20 years of paying everything on time seem to mean nothing during these lean times, although we both continue to try.
  • life
    no one's getting out alive, yet life goes on...
  • Government take over
    The bail out is nothing but another government take over and more government control over our lives. Why should we cater to losers who expect everything to be handed over to them free and at someone's else expense? The majority of these people should have never purchased a home because they cannot afford it and they should have stuck with the rent.
  • Bailout
    To all you stupid jerks that keep your head above water, pay all you bills, live within your means, shame on you., And being responsible shame on you again, guess the good guys come in last.
  • who's Going to Bail me out?
    I've worked hard all my life and have always struggled,yet have paid my way.I've been a single Dad for 2 children that are now grown and on their own for all of their lives.I've had no help of ANY KIND, from anyone,let alone the Buffoons in Government. Period!
  • Stop, please!!
    This can't go on. Irresponible behavior can't be rewarded. The banks have to just rewrite the loans to around 6% and if they can't meet their obligation then, they should be foreclosed on.
  • new policy?
    seems like the new government policy, fittingly brought out by the Bush administration, is to reward irresponsibility!
  • Bailout
    I own close to 100 properties - Have always paid all my bills on time, and continue to do so. Guess what -- no entity is lined up to help me with the multi millions I owe, and I DON'T WANT IT!! I take 100% responsibility for my life and circumstances. As soon as everyone else does -- we won't have this problem!
  • Response to Jessica
    And...we are supposed to feel sorry for you and help bail you out because...? I'm sick and tired of it! I resent having my tax money used because you or someone else made a bad decision. If you lose your home, then you lose it. You and your husband can work in public work like my husband and I do and build your life back up. Sorry, but you get NO sympathy from me.
  • Credit Cards Too!
    I read this morning that the banks and credit card companies want THEIR piece of the bailout money too. Get this, people in over their heads with CC debt would be eligible for a 40% (on average) reduction in their balances to help them cope.

    Is this a great country or what? And we haven't even elected Obama yet!
  • Response to Jessica
    Jessica,

    I understand you and your husband are self-employed but it is not like the state of this economy just popped up. If the jobs were a problem you have the ability to change jobs. When houses were selling through the roof everyone wanted to be a real estate agent. When houses were being built contractors were building spec houses and making millions. Now that this has dried up those that were greedy are now feeling the pain.

    I think you and your husband should look for other work as those two professions will have issues for many years.
  • Foreclosures
    Why is always the people, like myself, who do everything the right way always get stuck with the bill? I have always been concious about my credit since I was in college because I knew having good credit goes a long ways. If kids come into our office I don't talk to them about my job as they don't really care, I talk about life. I always tell them if you have good credit you will get lower rates when it comes to many things and you will be ahead of many people.

    I understand that foreclosed properties damage, or lower the value of my home. I understand the need to try and help but that should be between the lender and the homeowner and not me who pays his mortgage and pays my taxes. I also hear this tactic of lowering their principal amount which lowers their payment. This is stupid as these people can't afford the house they are in. They will get into the same problems. How fair is this when I pay my principal down from hard work and this person gets their's paid down because they can't hack it.
  • Reply to Jessice the R.E. agent
    Jessica, if you're facing foreclosure that means you didn't do what you were "supposed to do". You and your husband are the ONLY ones to blame for your predicament. You're supposed to understand that good times don't last. That recessions do come, and your supposed to have money set aside for these slower times. It's called having savings. You're to blame..and no one else. If you had done all the right things you wouldn't be in the situation that you are in.
  • Agree with Karen....
    Hey Karen. You just described my dead-beat neighbor. Hasn't had a job (by choice) in 8 years and is living off of refinance money. I believe that overextended expecations are the majority here. The majority of these grifters just wanted something for nothing. I feel badly for you Jessica as I do understand that there are exceptions to every rule.
  • Bailout BS!!!
    A popular radio personality said it all -- economic justice vs. economic injustice. Justice equals you get what you deserve. Injustice equals you get what you THINK you deserve at the expense of others!!! Are we then going to extend the "bailiut" to the utility companies who aren't getting paid for the electricity, gas and water???
  • Bailout
    Are you kidding, we might jusy end up a welfare country. I bought my house under my means just to make sure I can pay for it, years ago, the gravey train doesn't last forever and neither does the bad times, this is nothing new. If you can't afford it don't buy it, it's that simple. Nothing goes up in a straight line, This bailout stuff stinks. In life everybody doesn't win. If this bailout goes through, I want a partial refund on my house.
  • Foreclosures
    I understand that a majority of the foreclosures are due to consumers "over buying" from homes to cars along with predatory lending. There are however those who have done exactly what they were supposed to and are at risk now for foreclosure. My husband and I are both self-employed. I am a real estate agent and my husband is a general contractor. I hear about "joe the plumber" but no one ever hears about 'andy the contractor" who is trying to run a small business, pays his bills, has a 30 year fixed mortgage, and lives BELOW his means. Everyone assumes that those facing foreclosure must be losers and trying to run from their responsibilites. NOT ALWAYS TRUE!!! Due to the down turn in the housing market and the slowing of new construction we now are facing the possibilty of foreclosure. We did what we were "supposed" to do and are now burning through our savings trying to hold our family together.
  • Federal bailout for homeowners
    As a real estate broker in the Atlanta area, I'm appalled at what I'm witnessing! I wish the Feds would look into all the "stuff" and cars that defaulting homeowners purchased with their home loans. Seems that buyers purchased their home with zero money down and are now vacating their home and keeping all their STUFF. This is more the norm in the Atlanta area and we, the taxpayers, are paying for this STUFF?!@#?
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
THIS WEEK'S POLL
advertisement