advertisement
Looking for something on the site? Search for it here! Also see Clark's Greatest Hits

Sep 03, 2008 -- Fee-only financial planners are in your best interest

Do you have money to invest, but you're not sure where to put it? Most people who are unsure about investments hire someone to help. One of the greatest danger points is in mid-career, when you find yourself with a great deal of money in a 401K. At that time you're at the greatest risk, because that's when you're most likely to end up hiring a commissioned salesperson. Is that a problem in itself? No. There are plenty of situations when paying a commission is just fine. But in the investment world, there can be inherent conflict of interest with commissions. There are plenty of investment products that may not be the best choice for you, but you may be sold on them because the commissions are humongous. Variable and Index Annuities are referred to as 'sold', not 'bought', since people don't buy these on their own -- they are convinced to do so. Salespeople use code words such as Retirement Secured Account and other phony phrases to keep from tipping you off that you're being sold an annuity. Sometimes a Life, or Immediate Annuity makes sense, but the commissions are so low you won't hear much about them.

Clark wants to warn you away from another term: "fee-based planners." These salespeople start with a fixed fee, but the commissions on products they may sell you defray those initial costs, which again, may not be in your best interest. Honest commissioned salespeople will rise above their personal interests and sell what's right for you.

The stakes are so high in investing that Clark urges you to consider fee-only planners. They'll give you a fixed price up front for their services, regardless of the product they recommend. You won't have to worry about conflict of interest. Their success will depend on your good word of mouth and how well they did by you. To find a good one, go to the National Association of Personal Financial Advisers website, NAPFA.org. Another good resource is Garrett Planning Network: garrettplanningnetwork.com

Unfortunately, Clark won't be able to answer any questions submitted via commenting. If you have a question, please try posting it to our message boards.

Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • Financial Planning for Marriage
    My boyfriend and I are looking for an advisor to help us analyze our current financial situations and determine the best next steps to help us prepare for marriage and a strong financial future. At this point, we simply need advice. What is the best resource to find a planner who is not going to try to sell us financial products?
  • this is why i'm fee only
    I don't sell insurance or investments, but help folks set up a roadmap for financial success so that they can choose their own investments and insurance needs and then buy them via a broker who will shop for the best commission structure.
  • Morgan Stanley or Not?
    So should I stay with my broker at Morgan Stanley or switch to Charles Schwab and avoid his fees? He's not bad, but then again, I have never really made much with him. He never seems to have any more knowledge re: Worldcom, Enron, and the latest downturn.. (not his fault?). Am I really safer having a broker watch my portfolio (even though he never does anything), or should I have full control in a place like C. Schwab? Thanks -
  • Another Fee Only Resource
    Another excellent fee-only resource is ACA (Alliance of Cambridge Advisors). You can check them out at www.acaplanners.org.
  • Not so much...
    I have just finished rounds and rounds of interviews to become a financial advisor. The fee based planners tended to be just as interested in commission as anyone else, they just got the fee as well. My impression is that ethical FA's will change how they are handling your case/ their payment structure if you ask, but its assumed you don't care if you don't ask. A good FA will look at what you need and take care of that before they take care of their own money, because having you happy long term gets them more money in the end.
  • Variable Life
    Not typically. These instruments are "sold" on the basis of having a built in investment on top of the insurance. The internal costs involved are quite expensive relative to the benefits you get in return. Buy a term policy (or two with different terms; one 15 year policy and one 30 policy). Variable insurance mainly makes sense when someone has or will have estate tax issues. I have rarely seen someone where is works as it was illustrated when sold.

    Hope this helps.
  • Is a variable life insurance policy a good idea.
  • NAPFA Planner perspective
    Clark has it pretty much correct. Here is something your listeners should keep in mind. NAPFA is an excellent organization (I am a member), but the majority of NAPFA members I know are more interested in managing assets for a fee (% of Assets), and will sometimes throw in a simple financial plan for free.

    I don't do that, but the reason why many planners have given up trying to charge a fee for a plan is that you can rarely get paid fairly to do one. Most plans (that I've done) require 40+ hours of time it total. Yet most people will only pay $1000 or less. That's $25/hr. Financial planning practices need to earn at least $100/hr- and more realistically $150/hr. You see the problem.

    Personally, I try to insist on having a plan (even if I don't do it), since it uncovers many issues that need to be analyzed. Sometimes this turns potential new clients away.

    In terms of a fee to manage assets, I firmly believe the best model for the client (middle market & higher) is a retainer / flat fee model.
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
THIS WEEK'S POLL
advertisement