advertisement
Looking for something on the site? Search for it here! Also see Clark's Greatest Hits

Jun 25, 2008 -- Mortgage bailout proposal to help banks, not homeowners

CLARKONOMICS/RIP-OFF ALERT: Here's a story that's disturbed Clark so much it required both a Clarkonomics sounder and a rip-off alert one!

During the coming weeks, you're going to be hearing about how Congress is rescuing the American homeowner with a foreclosure bailout. This is natural rhetoric for an election year. But Clark wants you to know the real story.

First off, Countrywide is being sued in Illinois and California for conspiracy to defraud would-be homeowners. They allegedly issued loans when they knew there was no way they'd ever be paid off. Countrywide made a lot of money by originating these loans and then selling them off. The ones who really got burned were the investors who snatched them up from Countrywide.

Meanwhile, The Washington Post recently reported on a 28-page Bank of America document -- marked "confidential and proprietary" -- that's been floating around Capitol Hill.

The document basically outlines a potential bailout for lenders, where the Countrywide loans and others like them would be dumped on the government. This plan is being sold as a "bailout for homeowners," but it's the lenders who really benefit.

This is a perfect example of socialized risk and privatized reward. BoA is using its influence in Washington to get a deal for itself and other lenders from the government -- with taxpayers being put at risk to fund it.

The question remains: Will this move actually help the homeowners who are delinquent? We'll have to wait and see. There's no telling if this is a workable solution for those who got into loans they could never afford.

Most of us who pay our mortgages every month aren't happy about a taxpayer-supported bailout. But there are complicating factors. For example, every foreclosed house in a neighborhood lowers the value of surrounding homes by 1%.

Still, the takeaway here is this: The next time Congress pretends to act like a knight in shining armor, you need the real story behind the scenes. This is all about bailing out the influentials in the banking business.


Unfortunately, Clark won't be able to answer any questions submitted via commenting. If you have a question, please try posting it to our message boards.

Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • Corporate Socialism
    Those who are facing in Foreclosure:
    1) Will be enforced to accept their responsability when they went over their heads with such crazy loans.
    2) The Bank should also accept its responsability for offering crazy financing at a time of financial growth for them ("stated loans": no income verification).

    So now, if the Banks are to be bailed out, this is how it works for the Consumers:

    1) You loose your property along with all payments and down payment.
    2) Your tax money is helping to fund the Banking Industry's bailout.
    3) Your credit is screwed for several years.

    I am no fan of bailing either individual nor bank; everyone should take responsability for their actions. However I am left to wonder what would have happened if the Government would have bailed out those individuals that already have issues, it would have been a win-win situation for all....

    I am a conservative. At this moment it does not mean Republican. The last great Republican was Reagan and his bones must be tumbling in circles like protons in a high speed particle accelerator. I am watching what McCain is saying but I am not convinced. Now I know why people vote for those "crazy" Libertarians....I am starting to like them too.
  • Bail Out
    I'm not sure I understand why homeowners should not be helped. Gas prices have risen, food is up, utilities are going up and salaries are not moving. I'm with those who say how is it that we can bail out corporations, governments, pay Senators Health Insurance even when we can't afford to have our own... instead of a bail out just for one year let me have my federal, state, and Social Security taxes and I would be able to catch up with my back log. Therefore no one would have to feel as if they are giving me something I don't work for.
  • Mortgage Bailouts
    I wish Clark would include what we should say/do so our representatives in Congress would know we are watching and don't like what wwe are seeing. Thanks Clark
  • Mortgage bailout
    What is it about people who have a fixation on other people rather than the real enemies of their pocketbooks& purses?
    Your story and the legislation clearly says that the MORTGAGE companies are the ones being bailed out NOT the consumers!
    Here in the South and Georgia in particular there seems to be a biased thought pattern that does not allow CERTAIN people to understand truth even when it is clearly placed in front of them!
    I would venture to say they are the same ones who have problems with food stamps but NO PROBLEM with their tax dollars going to pay subsidies to oil companies in amounts that are triple what ALL social programs in the USA cost collectively!
  • What in the world is going on???
    This really irritates me! There were times when things were tough on me too, but I pulled myself through. My home is nothing fancy... I got what I knew I could afford. I made sound decisions and when things got tough, I got out and got a part-time job and cut the cable, and ate bologna ... without the cheese! I am tired of other people living off those who live within their means and do what they're suppose to do. IT DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE!!!
  • Bank Bailout
    When are we ever going to be held accountable for our own actions and accomplishments, or lack thereof? It seems the more we show our incompetance, the bigger the mistakes we make, and the louder we cry, the more we are rewarded. Every year I become a little more disgusted with the elected scam artists. It's no wonder that we are quickly becoming world reknowned for being lazy complainers.
  • proposed bailout
    I cant believe that such an event is even being considered! Rewarding the incompetent and greedy at the expense of the cautious and self reliant! What about the homeowner who paid part or partial cash, paid down his mortgage early, etc. No reward for them, they were conscientious! I have a neighbor who is in the process of preparing his house for sale and is all watermelon smiles. He is very clever and aware of this portending legislation and will escape a hugh mortgage obligation by proving the hugh reduction in value his home now has undergone. He will eventually get to walk free, since under the bill he will prove that
    FMV is what he can sell it for and you know who will pick up the tab for the loss, not the lender or mortgage note owner, the tax payer, you and I!
  • just like other entitlement programs and taxes
    similar to welfare and other handout programs, this is simply rewarding the foolish and possibly the crooks. Then in turn the government taxes to death the high income earners who can actually pay by the terms in which they agreed. plain and simple government stupidity...reward the idiots and tax the people who made reasonable decisions and lived up to their obligations.
  • What do I get?
    I should be getting a tax break for makeing an informed decision since were going to be giving money idiots who didn't!
  • Senate
    Clark needs to run for the Senate! Why do we always seem to have a choice of two dummies to vote for?
  • bailout of finalncial institutions
    I would rather see home values drop a percentage point rather than bailout the institutions that caused this mess. I believe the institutions will be forced to devolop programs on their own to forgive or help homeowners in need. I think that they would rather develop the needed programs rather than take ownership of the forclosed homes that they can not get rid of and cut their losses.
  • Lender Bail Out Artical - What can we do?
    Clark, what can we do to prevent such legislation from going forward?
  • bailout for financial institutions
    Well put, Clark. Though I wonder how much it will mount compared to the influential lobbist on the Hill. Call me pessimistic. So why not have a poll to see how many people (percentage) choose to accept falling home value in the neighborhood?
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
THIS WEEK'S POLL
advertisement