Several months ago, Clark told you that
Wachovia was allowing illegal drafts from seniors' accounts. The bank has now been fined a pitifully low amount -- $10 million -- for its actions in a similar case involving unethical telemarketers. Wachovia had been taking a cut whenever it allowed fraudulent 3rd party telemarketers to make withdrawals from customer accounts.
First off, Clark says shame on the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency for being asleep on the job and allowing Wachovia to do this. Second, where are the jail sentences for the responsible parties?
The New York Times has gotten hold of some internal memos that show the company knew full well what was going on with the telemarketers. A Wachovia executive even wrote "Double yikes!!!!" on a memo that incriminated the bank in the rip-off.
But, wait, it gets worse. Wachovia knows exactly who they stole an estimated $100 million or more from. Yet they got the feds to agree that they don't have to give the money back -- unless those who have been wronged file a claim via a form that doesn't exist yet!
Clark is extremely upset about the puny $10 million fine and lack of prison time. If you stick-up a teller, you'll no doubt go to jail for a long time. So what gives in this case? In the interest of full disclosure, Clark wants you to know that he owns Wachovia stock. He also has a good mind to go to the next annual meeting and confront the company's big wigs face-to-face.
A press statement from the bank claims they're taking the crime seriously and trying to correct the situation. But it seems that if Wachovia wants to do right, they'd give the money back without making people fill out the form. Will the company just keep the ill-gotten gains from those account holders who are too old or sick to fill out a form?
One last note of general warning: You usually only have 60 days to dispute fraudulent transactions at your bank or brokerage house. You snooze, you lose.