advertisement
Looking for something on the site? Search for it here! Also see Clark's Greatest Hits

Apr 22, 2008 -- Comcast's HD signal found to be too compressed

Electronics retailers love to set up Blu-ray DVD players with HDTVs to spotlight the amazingly life-like picture that you can get. Clark's family was recently transfixed when they saw Night at the Museum showing in this manner at one retailer. But then the average consumer is crestfallen when trying to duplicate the results at home using the same equipment with a cable or satellite signal. What's going on?

Comcast is being blasted by techies who tested its HD broadcasts and found the signal was seriously compressed and degraded. The use of compression is not unique to Comcast -- they're just having a lot of trouble with it. Clark is not suggesting there's any conspiracy on Comcast's part; he just thinks they don't have their act together yet. They went from 2:1 compression to 3:1 compression to squeeze more HD channels through the pipeline into your home. That was a business decision they made to compete with Dish Network and DirecTV, which both offer huge numbers of HD channels. But in doing so, Comcast comprised the integrity of its HD signal.

Even under optimal settings, the best you can hope for at home is 720p, which is the minimal HD standard. Compare that to the 1080p image you see at your electronics retailer. The difference in those numbers may not sound great, but it's actually like magnitudes going up on the Richter scale!

To maximize your best picture, you'll want to buy a $30 or $40 over-the-air HD antenna. That way, at least your local broadcast channels will get the true HD representation that you can't get through cable or satellite. Don't fall for the ploy of spending hundreds extra on that new HD set to improve your picture!


Unfortunately, Clark won't be able to answer any questions submitted via commenting. If you have a question, please try posting it to our message boards.

Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • Direct tv
    2 years ago we moved and decided to go with the dish instead of cable. We have have numerous problems with it having to wait a day or 2 for a technician to come out and fix the problem. It happened AGAIN and when I said lets go back to cable my husband said check out Clark 'cause I don't think the HD is as good as with the dish. Does this mean that our HD tv will not have as good a picture???
  • HD signal and OTA (over the air)
    I noticed the difference myself. I've had my HDTV going on 6 yrs and has seen the quality go down, both of my tv have built-in tuners which i sugguest everyone get. I discovered that my OTA rabbit ears ($9.95) picks up all the local HD broadcast in brillant 1080p, now my debate is weather to cut out comcast and do without my fav channels that I can not pick up with my OTA antenna. The compression of the signal is a bad thing. Proves comcast and the big corp. only think of themselves. There is not charge for OTA signal, other than u going out to buy a regular pair of rabbitt ears. If u live farther out the city the HD antenna or a powered antenna might be the way to go. Thanks Clark Howard for bring this to my attention. i listen daily to see what I can learn, and pass on to others.
  • HD Antenna is awesome
    I bought my 1080p TV two years ago and also bought a HD antenna for $50. I canceled my Dish network programing because I'm getting fifty over the air channels for free with my HD antenna! The picture is very close to my blu-ray player picture.
  • Comcast again
    Yes. Comcast at it again. I am so glad I dumped them. Compressed HD above HD prices...
  • HD Antenna not necessary
    HD signals are carried on the UHF band, so if your $3 rabbit ears gets good UHF reception, you shouldn't have to spend more money on an HD antenna. If you feel you need one, there are good passive HD antennas for around $20.
  • HD Antenna
    Naviguesser, I believe that Clark is addressing the people with HD TVs who might be tempted to get an even better HD TV because they are disappointed with their picture. I don't think that he is addressing the converter boxes, which are going to convert to a digital (but not HD!) signal for older TVs. The antenna makes sense in this case if you have cable tv because the over the air HD broadcast actually makes for a better picture than the cable signal. This is because of the compression of the signal done by the cable company. There are actually a lot of people buying nice new HD TVs and connecting bunny ears to them for this reason.
  • HD
    Are you talking about an antenna or a converter box for older tvs without a HD tuner. There is no need to spent 30 to 40 dollars for an antenna.
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
THIS WEEK'S POLL
advertisement
advertisement