Clarkhoward Home

Mon-Fri 1-4pm ET
Stations near you | help

Video Minute Archives
Daily Audio Archives
Rip-off Alerts
Call of the Week

Today's Show Notes
Previous Show Notes
Clark's Greatest Hits
Free and Cheap

Ask Team Clark
Call 10am-7pm ET
(404) 892-8227

Member Center
Blogs
Newsletters
Message boards
Meet the Team

Appearances
Books
Photos
TV
Talk to Clark 1-4pm ET:
(877) 87-CLARK or
(404) 872-0750

Advertisement
Ask Clark  Looking for something on the site? Search for it here!  Also see Clark's Greatest Hits
help

Bush unveils voluntary plan for homeowner aid

Don't attempt to adjust your radio if you hear some ambient noise this hour. That's just Clark broadcasting on location as part of Christmas Kids 2007! Interested in helping out a needy child this holiday season? Clark will be personally accepting donations at stores throughout the Atlanta area until Dec. 15. If you're not able to make it out, why not donate online? By working with the Salvation Army, your gifts can be distributed to children right in your own state or area!

Switching gears for a moment, Clark wants to discuss President Bush's announcement about a voluntary plan for people in mortgage meltdown to receive assistance from their lender. Those who took out blow-up mortgages like 2/28 loans in the last few years and have been current on their payments are most likely to benefit. 2/28 loans are typically offered to first-time homebuyers or people with damaged credit. The homebuyers were conned into 2-year loans at a decent rate that becomes outrageous after 24 months. Sometimes the blow-up rate will put the annual payments near or equal to the homeowners' annual income.

Under Bush's plan, lenders can voluntarily freeze the interest rate for 5 years if it's a homeowner's primary residence and they've made timely payments for the first 2 years. This will not help speculative buyers who got into 2/28 loans. Ironically, there are protections under bankruptcy law for spec buyers that don't apply to owner-occupied property. Clark thinks it's reasonable that there shouldn't be any coercion on lenders to freeze the rate. If the government were to try to impose its will, it would have a negative effect on the confidence of investors making loans. After all, why should an investor take on the risk if the government will just come in and decide how much money they'll be able to earn back? Some lenders would be wise to freeze the interest rate; it's a much cheaper option than having to pay to foreclose on tons of properties. Nobody wins in those situations.

Unfortunately, Clark won't be able to answer any questions submitted via commenting. If you have a question, please try posting it to our message boards.

Add your comment

Security Image * Please enter the code shown at left
what's this?

There are no comments yet. Be the first to post one!


Advertisement


This week's poll
NYC health inspectors have been handing out violations to chain restaurants that don't post calorie counts on their menus. What's your take on this?
I believe in what the inspectors are doing. Long live the food police.
This isn't a legitimate function of gov't-paid employees.
I couldn't care less. I'd be eating at home to save money!
see previous polls


Advertisement