Clarkhoward Home

Mon-Fri 1-4pm ET
Stations near you | help

Video Minute Archives
Daily Audio Archives
Rip-off Alerts
Call of the Week

Today's Show Notes
Previous Show Notes
Clark's Greatest Hits
Free and Cheap

Ask Team Clark
Call 10am-7pm ET
(404) 892-8227

Member Center
Blogs
Newsletters
Message boards
Meet the Team

Appearances
Books
Photos
TV
Talk to Clark 1-4pm ET:
(877) 87-CLARK or
(404) 872-0750

Advertisement
Ask Clark  Looking for something on the site? Search for it here!  Also see Clark's Greatest Hits
help

Sep 05, 2007 -- The mortgage crisis hits Capitol Hill

There's a big push and shove going on right now to determine who should help out people who are in over their heads with mortgages. The Federal Reserve had issued some weak guidelines, known as workouts, to try to lend a hand. That's OK, so long as it doesn't become a federal bailout. Clark is opposed to a plan that's been floating around Congress to use federal money to keep people in their homes. This whole problem came about because lenders were greedy and/or foolish in the loans they wrote, while borrowers were also foolish for believing they could handle loans that they really couldn't. There needs to be a change in how mortgage brokers are overseen -- they can't be the Wild West part of the market anymore. Lenders and mortgage brokers should be liable, along with defaulted borrowers, if they wrote unsuitable loans just to pad their pockets. Then they'll be forced to police their own industry. Taxpayers should not be on the hook to bail things out. When more than 90 percent of homeowners conscientiously meet their mortgage obligations, why should they subsidize the others who don't?

Unfortunately, Clark won't be able to answer any questions submitted via commenting. If you have a question, please try posting it to our message boards.

Add your comment

Security Image * Please enter the code shown at left
what's this?

There are no comments yet. Be the first to post one!


Advertisement


This week's poll
Do you like the idea of auto insurers switching to a pay-as-you-drive model -- where how, when and where you drive may be monitored?
Yes, I'm all for any approach that can save me money.
No, it's too much like having Big Brother in the back seat.
I'm not sure. I'd like the savings, but I don't know if I'd feel comfortable being monitored.
see previous polls


Advertisement